Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, A97A0149
Decision Date | 10 April 1997 |
Docket Number | No. A97A0149,A97A0149 |
Citation | 487 S.E.2d 602,226 Ga.App. 842 |
Parties | , 119 Ed. Law Rep. 1218, 97 FCDR 1845, 97 FCDR 3080 ZACH, INC. v. FULTON COUNTY, Georgia et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Bodker, Ramsey & Andrews, Stephen C. Andrews, David J. Maslia, Atlanta, for appellant.
Holland & Knight, Harold T. Daniel, Jr., James R. McCain, Jr., Atlanta, Clifford E. Hardwick IV, Bernard R. Thomas, Sr., Joiava Thomas, Atlanta, for appellees.
Following the recent decision of Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, 217 Ga.App. 315, 457 S.E.2d 574, where this Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Zach, Inc.'s motion from summary judgment, this case was returned to the superior court and defendants Fulton County and the City of Atlanta moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff Zach, Inc. filed an opposing motion for summary judgment supported by additional evidence in the form of the affidavit of Dr. Gerald Wayne Clough, President of Georgia Institute of Technology. Plaintiff appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants and the denial of its motion for summary judgment. Held:
Plaintiff argues that following our earlier decision it was left to prove only one fact, "that it [Zach, Inc.] is an 'arm or extension' of Georgia Tech." Dr. Clough's affidavit provides much detailed information concerning the structure and control of the Greek letter organizations at Georgia Tech. It is clearly established that the organization operating on plaintiff's property is an integral member of the university community and functions in a manner indistinguishable from those similar organizations which occupy university owned property which is not taxed. Nonetheless, it is apparent upon the face of our earlier decision that not only has plaintiff not shown that it is an "arm or extension" of the university, but that the record shows affirmatively and without conflict that plaintiff is not an "arm or extension" of Georgia Tech. This is true because Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, 217 Ga.App. 315, 316, 457 S.E.2d 574, supra. The factual basis for this conclusion is not contradicted by Dr. Clough's affidavit and the limited scope of the issues on the earlier appeal from the denial of plaintiff'...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Keith v. Alexander Underwriters General Agency, Inc.
... ... by Alexander, Alexander filed suit against Keith in Meriwether County to collect this amount. A default judgment was entered in that case, ... ...
-
Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, A98A2362.
...Ga. 544, 307 S.E.2d 491 (1983). In the second case, we affirmed summary judgment in favor of Fulton County. Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, 226 Ga.App. 842, 487 S.E.2d 602 (1997). We explicitly found that the record proved that Zach was not an "arm or extension" of Georgia Tech but was an enti......
-
Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County
..."arm or extension" thereof. Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, 217 Ga.App. 315, 457 S.E.2d 574 (1995) (Zach I); Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, 226 Ga.App. 842, 487 S.E.2d 602 (1997) (Zach II). However, the Court of Appeals did not address Zach's contention that denial of the application of the exem......
-
Rice v. Higginbotham
...Constitution was not raised or ruled upon in the trial court and presents nothing for appellate review. Zach, Inc. v. Fulton County, 226 Ga.App. 842, 843, 487 S.E.2d 602 (1997). 2. Even though service was proper, we agree with Rice that the Probate Court erred by striking her caveat filed o......