Zack v. Tucker
| Decision Date | 30 April 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. 09–12717.,09–12717. |
| Citation | 678 F.3d 1203,23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 994 |
| Parties | Michael Duane ZACK, III, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Kenneth S. TUCKER, Pam Bondi, Respondents–Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Martin J. McClain (Court–Appointed), Linda McDermott (Court–Appointed), McClain & McDermott, P.A., Wilton Manors, FL, for Petitioner–Appellant.
Charmaine M. Millsaps, Tallahassee, FL, for Respondents–Appellees.
Michael A. Rotker, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae.
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida (No. 05–00369–CV–RH); Robert Hinkle, Judge.
(Opinion Jan. 9, 2012, 666 F.3d 1265, 11th Cir.2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Beeman v. United States
-
Alston v. United States
... ... exercise of due diligence ... Id. The statute of limitations applies on a ... claim-by-claim basis. Zack v. Tucker , ... 704 F.3d 917, 918 (11th Cir. 2013). “Typically, the ... applicable triggering date is ‘the date on which the ... ...
-
Zack v. Tucker
...all the other claims asserted in his petition. Id. at 1269. We vacated the panel opinion and reheard the case en banc. Zack v. Tucker, 678 F.3d 1203 (11th Cir.2012).II. ISSUE Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) provides a single statute of limitations that applies to the application as a whole o......
- Thomas v. United States, Case No. 2:11-cv-08019-RDP-JEO