Zanki v. Cahill
| Decision Date | 11 May 2004 |
| Citation | 2 N.Y.3d 783,812 N.E.2d 1257,780 N.Y.S.2d 307 |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | ENISA ZANKI et al., Appellants, v. GERALD K. CAHILL et al., Defendants, and CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. CALIFORNIA JKC PROPERTIES, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants. |
Robert A. Skoblar, New York City, for appellants. Wilson, Bave, Conboy, Cozza & Couzens, P.C., White Plains (James A. Rogers of counsel), for defendant, third-party plaintiff-respondent and third-party defendant-respondent.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.
The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the alleged injuries resulted from a dangerous recurring condition of which defendant Cushman & Wakefield had actual or constructive notice.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Vitiello v. Home Buyers Resale Warranty Corp.
- Schiffer v. Slomin's, Inc.
-
Ohadi v. Magnetic Constr. Grp. Corp.
...before or after accident, and the wet sleeve she observed after fall could be attributed to other causes], affd 2 N.Y.3d 783, 780 N.Y.S.2d 307, 812 N.E.2d 1257 [2004] ). Industrial Code § 23-1.7(e)(2) may serve as a predicate for plaintiff's Labor Law § 241(6) claim, as it applies to slippi......
-
Mantzoutsos v. 150 St. Produce Corp.
...ISK Manhattan, Inc., 10 A.D.3d 510, 512, 781 N.Y.S.2d 648; Zanki v. Cahill, 2 A.D.3d 197, 199, 768 N.Y.S.2d 471, affd. 2 N.Y.3d 783, 780 N.Y.S.2d 307, 812 N.E.2d 1257; Keum Choi v. Olympia & York Water St. Co., 278 A.D.2d 106, 107, 718 N.Y.S.2d 42; Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc., 248 A.D.2d 436,......