Zapp v. Michaelis
| Decision Date | 16 January 1883 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 1441. |
| Citation | 58 Tex. 270 |
| Parties | ROBERT ZAPP v. THEO. MICHAELIS. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Bibby v. Bibby, 3611.
...and clearly wrong. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Somers, 78 Tex. 439, 14 S.W. 779; Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Schmidt, 61 Tex. 282; Zapp v. Michaelis, 58 Tex. 270, 275; Turner v. Ontiberos, Tex.Civ. App., 193 S.W. This case falls within the rule stated. For the purpose of showing that the deed in que......
-
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Sherer
...the Supreme Court." That decision was followed in Short v. Kelly, 62 S. W. 944, and in other decisions which might be cited. In Zapp v. Michaelis, 58 Tex. 270, it was said: "This court has no doubt held on many occasions, and wisely held, for many reasons, that where the evidence is so conf......
-
Sonora Realty Co. v. Fabens Townsite & Imp. Co.
...177 S. W. 1008; Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Somers, 78 Tex. 439, 14 S. W. 779; Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Schmidt, 61 Tex. 282; Zapp v. Michaelis, 58 Tex. 270; Short v. Kelly (Tex. Civ. App.) 62 S. W. 944; Kohlberg v. Awbrey & Semple (Tex. Civ. App.) 167 S. W. Do the facts before us come withi......
-
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Duelm
...adoption of that statute, it was a frequent practice to suggest a remittitur, and to affirm the judgment in case it was filed. Zapp v. Michaelis, 58 Tex. 270; Chadwick v. Meredith, 40 Tex. 380; Vance v. Lindsey, 60 Tex. 286; Taylor v. Hall, 20 Tex. 211; Railway Co. v. Johnson, 72 Tex. 95, 1......
Request a trial to view additional results