Zawadzki v. Checker Taxi Co.
Decision Date | 22 April 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 81 C 5749.,81 C 5749. |
Citation | 539 F. Supp. 207 |
Parties | Paul ZAWADZKI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHECKER TAXI COMPANY, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Stephen J. Heller, Law Offices of Arthur S. Gomberg, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.
Allen L. Wiederer, Jesmer & Harris, Chicago, Ill., for defendant Checker Taxi Co.
This diversity action is in part a garden-variety personal injury case arising out of an automobile accident in which plaintiffs Paul Zawadzki ("Zawadzki") and Kenneth Cantor ("Cantor") were passengers in a taxicab owned by Checker Taxi Company ("Checker"). What distinguishes it from the run of the mill is that Counts III, IV and V are brought by three corporations that employ Zawadzki and Cantor, claiming that the negligence of Checker and its driver have injured the employers by depriving them of the Zawadzki-Cantor services, sales and hence profits. Checker has moved to dismiss those counts for failure to state a cause of action.
Initially this Court, provided with no real assistance in briefing or research by either side, denied Checker's motion. It stated:
Now Checker, apparently taking the matter with greater seriousness, has renewed the motion. Each side has provided further briefing.
Research by plaintiffs' counsel has still not turned up any cases that allow an action in favor of a corporation for the loss incurred as a result of the negligent injury of its employees. Indeed Prosser is to some extent balanced by 1 Harper & James, Law of Torts § 6.10, at 506 (1956), which states such an action cannot lie where defendant has acted only negligently rather than intentionally.
As the earlier opinion indicated there is no Illinois case in point, and under Erie Illinois law provides the substantive rule of decision. But every recent case referred to in the parties' rebriefing refuses to recognize the action the plaintiff corporations seek to ground in Counts III, IV and V. This Court's own research has disclosed additional authority favorable to defendants and none to the plaintiff corporations. Thus the following recent decisions, relying on either common law or a related statute, have refused to allow corporations to recover for losses occasioned by negligent injuries to their employees: Phoenix Professional Hockey Club, Inc. v. Hirmer, 108 Ariz. 482, 502 P.2d 164 (1972); Nemo Foundations, Inc. v. New River Co., 155 W.Va. 149, 181 S.E.2d 687 (1971); Snow v. West, 250 Ore. 114, 440 P.2d 864 (1968); Frank Horton & Co. v. Diggs, 544 S.W.2d 313, 316-17 (Mo.App.1976); Baughman Surgical Associates, Ltd. v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 302 So.2d 316 (La.App.1974); Ferguson v. Green Island Contracting Corp., 44 A.D.2d 358, 355 N.Y.S.2d 196 (App.Div.1974); Steele v. J & S Metals, Inc., 32 Conn.Supp. 17, 335 A.2d 629 (Super.Ct.1974); Preiser Scientific, Inc. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., 432 F.2d 1002 (4th Cir. 1970) (West Virginia law); Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 153 F.2d 958,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Fruit Product Co., Inc. v. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co., 16077
...(4th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 1009, 91 S.Ct. 1253, 28 L.Ed.2d 545 (1971) (applying West Virginia law); Zawadzki v. Checker Taxi Co., 539 F.Supp. 207 (N.D.Ill.1982) (applying Illinois law); Phoenix Professional Hockey Club, Inc. v. Hirmer, 108 Ariz. 482, 502 P.2d 164 (1972) (In Banc......
-
I. J. Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. Jackson
... ... v. Jackson (Fla.App.1979) 368 So.2d 443; Zawadzki v. Checker Taxi Co. (N.D.Ill.1982) 539 F.Supp. 207; B.V. Merrow Co. v. Stephenson (1980) 102 ... ...
-
Morton v. Merrillville Toyota, Inc.
...341 S.E.2d 61; Ireland Electric Corp. v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. (1983), 166 Ga.App. 150, 303 S.E.2d 497; Zawadzki v. Checker Taxi Co. (N.D.Ill.1982), 539 F.Supp. 207; B.V. Merrow Co. v. Stephenson (1980), 102 Mich.App. 63, 300 N.W.2d 734; Frank Horton & Co., Inc. v. Diggs (1976), Mo.......
-
Schipke v. Grad
...75, 462 A.2d 800, 804 (1983). Cf. Continental Casualty Co. v. P.D.C., Inc., 931 F.2d 1429 (10thCir.1991); Zawadzki v. Checker Taxi Co., 539 F.Supp. 207 (N.D.Ill.1982); Steele v. J & S Metals, Inc., 32 Conn.Supp. 17, 335 A.2d 629 (1974) (denying recovery for employers' loss of profits due to......