Zeitinger v. Hackworth

Decision Date06 November 1893
PartiesZEITINGER v. HACKWORTH et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Wayne county; John L. Thomas, Judge.

Trespass by Anthony F. Zeitinger against John J. Hackworth and David J. Allen. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Reversed.

C. D. Yancey, for appellants. Raney & Carty, for respondent.

BLACK, C. J.

This was an action of trespass for entering upon the W. ½ of the S. W. ¼ of section 5, township 29, range 4 in Wayne county, and carrying away timber trees alleged to be of the value of $600. The jury found for plaintiff in the sum of $10, and the defendants appealed. The case turned upon the question of title. The plaintiff put in evidence a tax deed from the register of lands to Joel D. Lewis, dated in December, 1863. The court held this deed to be void as a conveyance, but good as color of title, so the plaintiff's title depends upon the question whether he and those under whom he claims have acquired title by 10 years' adverse possession. The real question in the case is whether the demurrer to the plaintiff's evidence should have been sustained. As the demurrer was interposed and overruled at the close of plaintiff's evidence, and the defendants thereafter introduced their evidence, we must consider the demurrer in the light of all the evidence in the case. Besides the deed before mentioned, the plaintiff put in evidence the following deeds, which are in due form, and properly described the land: Joel Lewis to John Kerr, dated August 2, 1869; John Kerr to John Long, dated October 5, 1869; John Long to Joseph Raney, dated January 12, 1877; Joseph Raney to James McAllister, dated February 10, 1879; James McAllister to Joseph Raney, dated February 6, 1880; Joseph Raney to Frank Raney, dated 23d March, 1882; Frank Raney to Anthony Zeitinger, dated January 16, 1883; and Anthony Zeitinger to Anthony F. Zeitinger, the plaintiff, dated 12th December, 1887. Joseph Long, who received the deed from Kerr, dated 5th October, 1869, testified that he moved upon the land in that year, cleared seven or eight acres, built a cabin, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 1918
    ... ... 194. (3) Plaintiff not being in ... possession could not sue for trespass. Lindenbower v ... Bentley, 86 Mo. 515; Zeitinger v. Hackworth, ... 117 Mo. 505. (4) And he was not entitled to recover for ... injury to the inheritance because he did not show any ... ...
  • Thompson v. Granite Bituminous Paving Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 1918
    ...tenant, cannot recover in trespass as for a wrong committed against the possession (Lindenbower v. Bentley, 86 Mo. 515; Zeitinger v. Hackworth, 117 Mo. 505, 23 S. W. 763; Thurmond v. White Lime Ass'n, 125 Mo. App. 73, 102 S. W. 617), though, as an owner out of possession, he may have his ac......
  • Zeitinger v. Hackworth
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 6, 1893
  • State v. Kain
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 9, 1893

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT