Zellmer v. Department of Labor & Industries
Decision Date | 15 September 2020 |
Docket Number | 53627-7-II |
Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
Parties | JOEL ZELLMER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES, Respondent. |
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Joel Zellmer appeals the summary judgment dismissal of his lawsuit alleging that the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) violated the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW, in regard to three of his records requests. Because his complaint is time barred pertaining to Zellmer's first request and because L&I did not violate the PRA regarding his other two requests, we affirm.
Zellmer collected workers' compensation benefits for several years due to work-related injuries. Suspecting fraud, L&I started an investigation into Zellmer's claims.[1] In 2010, L&I requested that four doctors review Zellmer's medical records; L&I did not request that the doctors perform an Independent Medical Examination (IME) on Zellmer.[2] Dr. Steven Fey and Dr. Dennis Stumpp performed a records review regarding one claim, Dr. H Berryman Edwards performed a records review regarding another claim, and Dr. Alfred Blue performed a records review regarding a third claim.
Clerk's Papers (CP) at 49. L&I sent a letter to Zellmer, seeking clarification whether his request related to "Independent Medical Examinations" performed by the four doctors. CP at 52. Zellmer did not respond when L&I tried to clarify what he was requesting.
Nevertheless L&I began searching for the records. Laurel Chastain, a staff member in the public records unit, searched for responsive records. She sent the records request to the two L&I divisions that she determined would be most likely to have responsive records: The Insurance Services Claims Administration and Training Division and the Insurance Services Medical Information and Payment System Division. Neither division could located the requested documents. The searches showed that none of the four providers conducted IMEs in the three claims Zellmer identified in his request.
L&I notified Zellmer on August 26, 2016, that it could not locate the records and that it closed his request. Zellmer did not respond.
B. Second Request
On October 6, 2016, Zellmer requested copies of "each pdf[3] file . . . of each of the four forensic investigations under claims of Joel Martin Zellmer." CP at 60. Zellmer listed the names of the four doctors and the PDF files he was requesting. He also requested:
L&I again asked Zellmer to clarify that his request was for documents relating to IMEs performed by the four doctors. Zellmer did not respond.
On December 23, 2016 L&I sent Zellmer another clarification letter, stating:
Zellmer responded that he was seeking "records that demonstrate authorization (by L&I) and payment of monies to the four Independent Medical Examiners listed in my request for public records." CP at 69.
A staff member from Insurance Services Claims Administration informed Osborn that employees in the program had checked multiple areas for records and stated that they had no responsive records. A Heath Services Analysis employee stated that there did not seem to be any bills for any IMEs for the doctors or claims listed in Zellmer's request. Both divisions responded that they could not locate any responsive records.
On January 26, 2017, L&I mailed Zellmer a closing letter informing him that it had conducted a search but could not find responsive records because no IMEs existed and all but one of the claim investigations for his claims had been destroyed per L&I's retention schedule. Zellmer did not respond.
C. Third Request
On February 4, 2017, Zellmer requested records on "[a]ny IMEs done between November 1, 2009 thru April 30, 2010." CP at 41. L&I assigned Forms and Records Analyst, Donna Desch, to Zellmer's request. Through prior searches for the same records by L&I, Desch was aware that there were no records relating to IMEs performed from November 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010. Nonetheless, Desch searched L&I's database and found no IMEs for this period.
L&I notified Zellmer on February 10, 2017 that it had searched L&I's records and found no responsive records. Zellmer did not respond.
D. Fourth Request On February 5, 2017, Zellmer sent a fourth records request, asking for the following records:
CP at 110. In this request, Zellmer removed any reference to IMEs. L&I provided Zellmer with 158 pages of records, including records relating to Drs. Fey, Berryman, Stumpp, and Blue.
II. Trial Court Proceedings
On January 12, 2018, Zellmer filed a complaint against L&I, alleging L&I violated the PRA in how it responded to his first three records requests. L&I moved for summary judgment, arguing it timely responded to Zellmer's requests, conducted thorough and adequate searches, and found no responsive records to Zellmer's requests. L&I further argued that Zellmer's complaint relating to his first request was barred by the statute of limitations. Zellmer responded that the statute of limitations should be tolled based on the equitable tolling doctrine.
The trial court granted L&I's motion for summary judgment, dismissing all of Zellmer's claims. The court also denied Zellmer's subsequent motion for reconsideration. He appeals.
Zellmer contends the trial court erred in granting L&I's motion for summary judgment because L&I violated the PRA by...
To continue reading
Request your trial