Zimmerman's, Inc. v. McDonough Const. Co., 32959
| Decision Date | 05 December 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 32959,32959 |
| Citation | 240 Ga. 317,240 S.E.2d 864 |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Parties | ZIMMERMAN'S, INC. v. McDONOUGH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al. |
Kirby G. Bailey, Decatur, for appellant.
Hurt, Richardson, Garner, Todd & Cadenhead, Frederick N. Gleaton, Robert L. Todd, Howell Hollis, III, Freeman & Hawkins, David A. Handley, Gambrell, Russell, Killorin & Forbes, Atlanta, for appellees.
The appellant, Zimmerman's, Inc., appeals two orders of the Superior Court of Fulton County which granted the appellee's motions for summary judgment.
On April 30, 1968, Zimmerman's subleased from Adair Realty a portion of the premises at 62 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, Georgia, for use as a retail clothing store. The plaster ceiling in the store collapsed on June 8, 1972, damaging Zimmerman's merchandise and interrupting their business, resulting in a loss of earnings and profits.
One year following the ceiling's collapse, Zimmerman's executed a "General Release, Indemnity and Agreement" wherein the consideration of $6,828.48 paid by Adair Realty Company was acknowledged as "representing payment in full for all damages suffered by tenant and Zimmerman in connection with the cave-in," and further stating that Zimmerman's "(a) hereby release and forever discharge Adair Realty Company . . . from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, sums of money, damages and judgments whatsoever in law or in equity, which tenant or Zimmerman, or either of them, has ever had, now has or may or might in the future have against the said Adair Realty Company, . . . arising by reason of or in any manner relating to the cave-in . . .
"It is understood and agreed that this is a full and final release of all claims of any nature and kind whatsoever, and releases claims that are known, unknown, suspected and unsuspected."
On April 15, 1976, Zimmerman's filed this lawsuit against the appellee, McDonough Construction Company and six other named defendants, including Adair Realty, seeking to hold them jointly and severally liable for the damages that had been sustained as a result of the ceiling's collapse. On June 22, 1976, Zimmerman's amended its complaint deleting four of the named defendants, including Adair Realty Company as agent and sublessor, thus reducing the case to its present parties.
Following the amendment of the complaint, motions for summary judgment on various grounds were filed on behalf of the three remaining defendants in the case. All three, however, contended that the "General Release, Indemnity and Agreement" in effect had released all defendants as to any damages suffered by Zimmerman's as a result of the ceiling's collapse. 1
Initially, the court issued an order on July 21, 1977, denying appellee's motions for summary judgment based upon the release, however, granted defendants McDonough Construction and A. R. Abrams' motions for summary judgment on the other grounds alleged. (See, Footnote 1). Subsequent to the entering of that order, appellee, Continental Wrecking, moved for a reconsideration of that portion of the court's order which had denied their motion for summary judgment based upon the release. On July 27, 1977, the court vacated that portion of its July 21st order denying Continental Wrecking's motion for summary judgment and granted summary judgment as to all defendants based upon the general release. This appeal followed.
Zimmerman contends that (1) the trial court erred in granting a motion for summary judgment as to all defendants based upon the "General Release, Indemnity and Agreement"; (2) that the trial court erred in granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants McDonough Construction and A. R. Abrams on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations set out in Code Ann. § 3-1006; and (3) that the trial court erred in granting A. R. Abrams' motion for summary judgment on the ground that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to said defendant. We affirm.
1. It is a well established rule in this state that "a release executed in favor of one joint tortfeasor, in full settlement of damages, acts also as a release in favor of all other joint tortfeasors." Knight v. Lowery, 228 Ga. 452, 455, 185 S.E.2d 915, 917 (1971); Donaldson v. Carmichael, 102 Ga. 40, 29 S.E. 135 (1897); Pierce v. Smith, 129 Ga.App. 593, 200 S.E.2d 371 (1973); City of Buford v. Hosch, 104 Ga.App. 615, 122 S.E.2d 287 (1961).
Appellant contends that the defendants herein were not joint tortfeasors, and, therefore, the rule as stated...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Travelers Indem. Co. v. A.M. Pullen & Co., 62856
...against the other alleged tortfeasors. Maxey v. Hospital Authority, 245 Ga. 480, 265 S.E.2d 779 (1980); Zimmerman's, Inc. v. McDonough, etc., Co., 240 Ga. 317, 240 S.E.2d 864 (1977); Pennsylvania Casualty Co. v. Thompson, 130 Ga. 766, 61 S.E. 829 I would affirm the grant of summary judgment......
-
In re World Bazaar Franchise Corp.
...Menendez v. Perishable Distributors, Inc., 254 Ga. 300, 301, 329 S.E.2d 149 (1985); see also Zimmerman's Inc. v. McDonough Constr. Co., 240 Ga. 317, 319, 240 S.E.2d 864 (1977); Donaldson v. Carmichael, 102 Ga. 40, 42, 29 S.E. 135 However, Georgia courts have modified the strict application ......
-
Pease & Elliman Realty Trust v. Gaines
...for determining joint tortfeasors is set forth in Mitchell v. Gilson, 233 Ga. 453, 454, 211 S.E.2d 744..." Zimmerman's, Inc. v. McDonough &c. Co., 240 Ga. 317, 320, 240 S.E.2d 864. The test is: " 'If the separate and independent acts of negligence of two or more persons or corporations comb......
-
Menendez v. Perishable Distributors, Inc.
...all other persons or entities that might be liable. Henslee v. Houston, supra, 566 F.2d at 480; Zimmerman's, Inc. v. McDonough Construction Co., 240 Ga. 317, 319, 240 S.E.2d 864, 866 (1977). Here, the unambiguous terms of the settlement agreement released Pearson from liability and therefor......