Zimmerman v. NBC Universal Media, LLC, 5D14–2644.
| Decision Date | 01 December 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D14–2644.,5D14–2644. |
| Citation | 212 So.3d 376 (Table) |
| Parties | George ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. NBC UNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
212 So.3d 376 (Table)
George ZIMMERMAN, Appellant,
v.
NBC UNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, et al., Appellees.
No. 5D14–2644.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec. 1, 2015.
Henry N. Didier, Jr., Orlando, and James E. Beasley and Barbara R. Axelrod, Philadelphia, PA., Pro Hac Vice, for Appellant.
Gregg D. Thomas and Rachel E. Fugate, of Thomas & LoCicero PL, Tampa, and Lee Levine and Gayle C. Sproul, of Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, Washington, DC, Pro Hac Vice, and Susan Weiner, New York, NY, Pro Hac Vice, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
PALMER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Hicks v. Am. Integrity Ins. Co. of Fla.
...that AIIC’s arguments regarding the per curiam affirmed decision without written opinion in Zimmerman v. American Integrity Insurance, 212 So. 3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (table decision), are improper.Hicks is correct that the motion for rehearing reargues the issue already decided by this ......
-
Hicks v. Am. Integrity Ins. Co. of Fla.
...that AIIC's arguments regarding the per curiam affirmed decision without written opinion in Zimmerman v. American Integrity Insurance, 212 So. 3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (table decision), are improper. Hicks is correct that the motion for rehearing reargues the issue already decided by this......
-
Whitely v. Am. Integrity Ins. Co. of Fla., Case No. 5D16-3719
...authority AIIC filed the day before oral argument, which referenced a per curiam affirmance in Zimmerman v. American Integrity Insurance, 212 So.3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (table decision). AIIC, who was also the appellee in Hicks, filed a motion for rehearing and certification in Hicks als......