Zimmerman v. NBC Universal Media, LLC, 5D14–2644.
| Decision Date | 01 December 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D14–2644.,5D14–2644. |
| Citation | Zimmerman v. NBC Universal Media, LLC, 212 So.3d 376(Table) (Fla. App. 2015) |
| Parties | George ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. NBC UNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Henry N. Didier, Jr., Orlando, and James E. Beasley and Barbara R. Axelrod, Philadelphia, PA., Pro Hac Vice, for Appellant.
Gregg D. Thomas and Rachel E. Fugate, of Thomas & LoCicero PL, Tampa, and Lee Levine and Gayle C. Sproul, of Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, Washington, DC, Pro Hac Vice, and Susan Weiner, New York, NY, Pro Hac Vice, for Appellees.
AFFIRMED.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Hicks v. Am. Integrity Ins. Co. of Fla.
...that AIIC’s arguments regarding the per curiam affirmed decision without written opinion in Zimmerman v. American Integrity Insurance, 212 So. 3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (table decision), are improper.Hicks is correct that the motion for rehearing reargues the issue already decided by this ......
-
Hicks v. Am. Integrity Ins. Co. of Fla.
...that AIIC's arguments regarding the per curiam affirmed decision without written opinion in Zimmerman v. American Integrity Insurance, 212 So. 3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (table decision), are improper. Hicks is correct that the motion for rehearing reargues the issue already decided by this......
-
Whitely v. Am. Integrity Ins. Co. of Fla., Case No. 5D16-3719
...authority AIIC filed the day before oral argument, which referenced a per curiam affirmance in Zimmerman v. American Integrity Insurance, 212 So.3d 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (table decision). AIIC, who was also the appellee in Hicks, filed a motion for rehearing and certification in Hicks als......