Zmotony v. Phillips

Decision Date09 July 1975
Docket NumberNo. B--5136,B--5136
Citation529 S.W.2d 760
PartiesLloyd E. ZMOTONY et ux., Petitioners, v. E. Leon PHILLIPS et al., Respondents.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Edward J. Wheeler, Pasadena, for petitioners.

E. Leon Phillips, Pasadena, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by property owners to enforce the following restrictions originally applicable to a 67.61-acre tract in Harris County:

3. Except as herein provided, no part of said tract shall be used for anything other than residential purposes.

6. No trailer, basement, tent, shack, garage, barn, or other out-building erected or placed on any part of said tract, shall at any time be used as a residence, nor shall any residence of a temporary character be permitted. . . .

Defendants Lloyd E. Zmotony and wife had purchased part of the land and moved a mobile home thereon, placed it on concrete blocks, poured a slab for a patio, and made arangements to obtain water and electricity when the suit was filed. Plaintiffs sought temporary and permanent injunctions commanding defendants to remove the mobile home from the property. The trial court denied a temporary injunction, and plaintiffs appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause with instructions to enter an order compelling defendants to remove the mobile home from the property and temporarily enjoining them from violating the restrictions. 525 S.W.2d 736.

The evidence discloses that another trailer home was situated across the street from the property of one plaintiff for at least three years prior to the filing of this suit. The facts have not been fully developed, and the record does not disclose the location of that trailer home with respect to the 67.61-acre tract or exactly how far it was from defendants' property. Defendants did not plead waiver, but the trial judge could reasonably have concluded that the restrictions may have been waived. There is also evidence that the expense of removing defendants' mobile home will be $1,000.00, and plaintiffs made no attempt to show that they will suffer any irreparable damage if the mobile home is allowed to remain on the property pending a trial on the merits. There is a question then as to plaintiffs' right to prevail, and it does not appear that a temporary injunction is required to prevent injury to them. In these circumstances it is within the discretion of the trial judge to deny interlocutory relief. Manning v. Wieser, Tex.Sup., 474...

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • Lassiter v. Bliss
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1977
    ...lights and water is still a trailer. In Phillips v. Zmotony, 525 S.W.2d 736 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston (14th Dist.)), rev'd per curiam, 529 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.1975), the court of civil appeals construed the following restrictive covenant to preclude mobile homes or trailer houses. The restrictive c......
  • Dempsey v. Apache Shores Property Owners Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 12, 1987
    ...v. Kattner, 502 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.Civ.App.1973, writ ref'd n.r.e.), and Phillips v. Zmotony, 525 S.W.2d 736 (Tex.Civ.App.), rev'd 529 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.1975). 1 Citing Lassiter, Bullock and Phillips, the Tyler Court of Appeals has held that double-wide manufactured homes are prohibited by a cov......
  • Kirkpatrick v. Memorial Hosp. of Garland
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 1993
    ...discretion when it makes a decision on conflicting evidence. See Davis v. Huey, 571 S.W.2d 859, 862 (Tex.1978); Zmotony v. Phillips, 529 S.W.2d 760, 762 (Tex.1975) (per curiam). We overrule points of error six and Because of our disposition of the Kirkpatricks' points of error, we need not ......
  • North Cherokee Village Membership v. Murphy, Docket No. 23165
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • October 18, 1976
    ...1973), Atkins v. Fine, 508 S.W.2d 131 (Tex.Civ.App., 1974), Phillips v. Zmotony, 525 S.W.2d 736 (Tex.Civ.App., 1975), Rev'd 529 S.W.2d 760 (Tex., 1975), the reasoning of Hussey, supra, has not been recanted by the Texas judiciary although on occasion it has been distinguished factually, E.g......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT