Zoref v. Glassman, 2006-02706.
Decision Date | 30 October 2007 |
Docket Number | 2006-02706. |
Parties | HAL ZOREF et al., Respondents, v. ANDREA GLASSMAN, Appellant, et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
An order directing a hearing to aid in the determination of a motion and cross motion does not dispose of the motion or cross motion and does not affect a substantial right, and therefore is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]; see also Kornblum v Kornblum, 34 AD3d 749, 751 [2006]; D'Agnese v Spinelli, 308 AD2d 561, 562 [2003]; Rosen v Swarzman, 296 AD2d 392, 393 [2002]). Any party aggrieved by an order entered subsequent to the hearing may take an appeal (see Davidson-Sakuma v Sakuma, 280 AD2d 577, 577-578 [2001]). Since leave to appeal has not been granted, we dismiss the appeal.
The Supreme Court's finding that the mortgage servicing agent received funding for the total amount of the loan prior to the mortgage closing is a finding of fact which is not independently appealable (see Clark v Weiner, 254 AD2d 322 [1998]).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Flamenbaum
...of Noelia T., 70 A.D.3d 957, 893 N.Y.S.2d 884;Lester & Assoc., P.C. v. Eneman, 69 A.D.3d 906, 893 N.Y.S.2d 611;Zoref v. Glassman, 44 A.D.3d 1036, 843 N.Y.S.2d 834;Clark v. Weiner, 254 A.D.2d 322, 678 N.Y.S.2d 293). To the extent that, in light of our determination on the appeal, the executo......
-
Reiss v. Roadhouse Rest.
...and we decline to grant leave to appeal ( see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Ciprijan v. Stone, 65 A.D.3d 659, 883 N.Y.S.2d 920; Zoref v. Glassman, 44 A.D.3d 1036, 843 N.Y.S.2d 834); and it is further, ORDERED that the appeal from the order dated November 16, 2007, is dismissed, as no appeal lies as of r......
-
Watkins-Bey v. City of N.Y.
...in the determination of a motion (see CPLR 5701[a][2] ; Shatara v. Ephraim , 137 A.D.3d 1244, 1246, 29 N.Y.S.3d 403 ; Zoref v. Glassman , 44 A.D.3d 1036, 843 N.Y.S.2d 834 ; Rosen v. Swarzman , 296 A.D.2d 392, 393, 745 N.Y.S.2d 465 ), and we decline to grant leave to appeal, as the appeal fr......
-
Verderber v. Commander Enterprises Centereach Llc
...dismiss the appeal because findings of fact which do not grant or deny relief are not independently appealable ( see Zoref v. Glassman, 44 A.D.3d 1036, 843 N.Y.S.2d 834; Davidson–Sakuma v. Sakuma, 280 A.D.2d 577, 578, 720 N.Y.S.2d 798; Meachum v. Outdoor World Corp., 273 A.D.2d 208, 209, 70......