Zurheide v. S-C Associates, LP, S-C

Decision Date02 March 1998
Docket NumberS-C
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
Parties1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 1890 Peter C. ZURHEIDE, et al., Plaintiffs, v.ASSOCIATES, LP, Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Defendant; AT & T Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Boeggeman, George, Hodges & Corde, P.C., White Plains (Leslie K. Arfine, of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellant.

Brody & Fabiani, New York City (Daniel O. Dietchweiler, of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant AT & T Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), entered May 14, 1997, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Workers' Compensation Law § 11, as amended (L.1996, ch. 635, § 2), is to be applied prospectively and is thus inapplicable here, where the underlying injury occurred before the effective date of the amendment (see, Morales v. Gross, 230 A.D.2d 7, 657 N.Y.S.2d 711; Delacruz v. Wistyn, NYLJ, Nov 3, 1997, at 27, col 6; Seymour v. Victor Balata Belting Co., 174 Misc.2d 677, 665 N.Y.S.2d 1010; see also, Massella v. Partner Indus. Products, --- A.D.2d ----, 665 N.Y.S.2d 948; Doria v. Cooke Properties, --- A.D.2d ----, 664 N.Y.S.2d 798; Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Cent. School Dist., 231 A.D.2d 102, 111, 661 N.Y.S.2d 293).

THOMPSON, J.P., and PIZZUTO, JOY and KRAUSMAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Kline v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • 16 Julio 1998
    ...instead seems to place primary importance on the date of the filing of the action. The Second Department decided Zurheide v. S-C Associates, 669 N.Y.S.2d 852 (N.Y.App.Div.1998), on March 2, 1998, also subsequent to the submission of this motion to the Magistrate Judge, but prior to the Maje......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT