Boyer v. Berryman
Decision Date | 29 April 1890 |
Docket Number | 14,031 |
Citation | 24 N.E. 249,123 Ind. 451 |
Parties | Boyer v. Berryman |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
Judgment affirmed.
M. E Clodfelter, J. A. Lindley, L. V. Maxedon and H. D. Vancleave for appellant.
W. T Brush, for appellee.
The appellant in his cross-complaint asserts title to the real estate described in it, and the appellee, who had brought an action for possession, dismissed his complaint and the cause was tried upon the issues joined on the cross-complaint.
The appellant requested the court to direct the sheriff to fill vacancies in the jury by summoning persons outside of the court room, but the request was denied. In this there was no error.
The record and proceedings in a former action between the parties were properly admitted in evidence. The court in which the action was tried had jurisdiction of the subject and of the parties, and the judgment was not void even if it be true, as the appellant asserts, that the court erred in referring the controversy to a master commissioner or referee. Where there is jurisdiction of the subject and of the parties, a judgment is not void, although the record and proceedings may abound in errors.
The second instruction given by the court reads as follows: There was no error in giving this instruction. It is now settled by our decisions that a deed of a person of unsound mind, made before office found, to one who has no knowledge of the grantor's incapacity is only voidable, and that, in order to avoid it, the consideration received must be tendered to the grantee. Fay v. Burditt, 81 Ind. 433; Copenrath v. Kienby, 83 Ind. 18. The doctrine of our cases is well sustained by the decisions of other courts. Elston v. Jasper, 45 Tex. 409; Pearson v. Cox, 71 Tex. 246 (10 Am. St. R. 740, 9 S.W. 124); Riggan v. Green, 80 N.C. 236 (30 Am. R. 77); Eaton v. Eaton, 37 N.J.L. 108 (18 Am. R. 716); Hovey v. Hobson, 53 Me. 451 (89 Am. Dec. 705); Hovey v. Chase, 52 Me. 304 (83 Am. Dec. 514); Allis v. Billings, 6 Met. 415 (39 Am. Dec. 744); Gribben v. Maxwell, 34 Kan. 8, 7 P. 584.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Citizens' St. R. Co. v. Horton
...numerous decisions of the supreme court of this state, to be voidable. See vide, Keller v. Insurance Co., 28 Ind. 170;Boyer v. Berryman, 123 Ind. 451, 24 N. E. 249;Peck v. Vinson, 124 Ind. 121, 24 N. E. 726;McMillan v. William Deering & Co., 139 Ind. 70, 38 N. E. 398, and decisions therein ......
-
Ratliff v. Baltzer's Adm'r
...... court of equity. (Crowthers v. Rowlandson, 27 Cal. 377; Moore v. Moore, 56 Cal. 89; Boyer v. Berryman, 123 Ind. 457, 24 N.E. 249; Pearson v. Cox, 71 Tex. 246, 10 Am. St. Rep. 740, 9 S.W. 124;. Eaton v. Eaton, 37 N.J.L. 109, 18 Am. Rep. ......
-
The Citizens' Street Railroad Company v. Horton
...... Supreme Court of this State, to be voidable. See. Keller v. Equitable Fire Ins. Co., 28 Ind. 170; Boyer v. Berryman, 123 Ind. 451, 24. N.E. 249; Peck v. Vinson, 124 Ind. 121, 24. N.E. 726; McMillan v. Deering & Co.,. 139 Ind. 70, 38 N.E. 398, and the ......
-
George Luhrs v. William Hancock, Lilly
...121 Ill. 33, 12 N. E. 213; Maloney v. Dewey, 127 Ill. 395, 19 N. E. 848; Woods v. Brown, 93 Ind. 164, 47 Am. Rep. 369; Boyer v. Berryman, 123 Ind. 451, 24 N. E. 249; Stigers v. Brent, 50 Md. 214, 33 Am. Rep. 317; Heard v. Sack, 81 Mo. 610; McCormick v. Paddock, 20 Neb. 486, 30 N. W. 602; La......