Pasquale v. Chandler

Decision Date24 March 1966
Citation350 Mass. 450,215 N.E.2d 319
PartiesDavid B. PASQUALE, Administrator, v. Charles F. CHANDLER et al.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Morris N. Gould, Clinton, for plaintiff.

Stanley B. Milton, Worcester (Robert C. Milton, Worcester, with him), for defendant Chandler.

James C. Donnelly, Jr., Worcester, for defendant Lentino.

Before SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.

REARDON, Justice.

In this action of tort involving alleged medical malpractice, the defendants presented motions for directed verdicts at the close of the evidence and the judge directed verdicts for the defendants on every count of the plaintiff's declaration. The case comes to us on the plaintiff's exceptions to the action of the judge.

By writ dated February 21, 1962, the defendants, Dr. Charles F. Chandler and Dr. Joseph W. Lentino, both of Clinton, were sued by David B. Pasquale as administrator of the estate of his father, Nunzio Pasquale. The action was for damages both for pain and suffering and for wrongful death. Alleged in the declaration, in a number of counts, were: (1) negligence in the performance of an operation on the decedent; (2) failure to diagnose and treat his condition properly; (3) negligence in the care and treatment of the decedent in the years following the operation; (4) fraudulent concealment of a cause of action; and (5) assault and battery upon the decedent by means of a surgical instrument.

We briefly summarize the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff. On October 10, 1955, Nunzio Pasquale, seventy-three years of age, visited Dr. Lentino. He had been feeling ill for some time, was pale and emaciated, had lost weight, had 'tarry stools,' and had been subject to digestive disturbances. On October 13, 1955, Dr. Lentino had X-rays taken of Pasquale at the Clinton Hospital which indicated a bleeding gastric ulcer. Following hospitalization of Pasquale and a conference with Dr. Chandler, it was decided to perform surgery. A subtotal gastrectomy, removal of most of the stomach, including the ulcer, was performed on October 22, 1955, by Dr. Chandler with the assistance of Dr. Lentino. The operation required approximately three and one-half hours. Dr. Chandler did not make a count of the surgical instruments employed but did cause a count to be made of sponges and needles utilized in the operation. Some fifty to seventy-five clamps were used, including approximately twenty-five so called Kelly clamps. A Kelly clamp is similar in appearance to a pair of scissors, is approximately eight inches in length, with curved serrated jaws and a ratchet type lock. It is employed to control bleeding during the progress of an operation. One such clamp was left in the abdominal cavity of the patient when the incision was closed.

After several weeks of convalescence in the hospital, and more particularly after October 29, 1955, Pasquale was in the exclusive care of Dr. Lentino who saw his patient on at least seventeen occasions, the last being April 7, 1961, less than one year before the commencement of this action. In 1955, when Pasquale went originally to Dr. Lentino, he provided for the taking of X-rays. In a visit on September 6, 1956, Dr. Lentino discussed the decedent's postoperative condition with him and cautioned him about his diet, stating that if gastric symptoms of which he was then complaining 'did not clear up' Pasquale should 'let him know and they would take an x-ray.' There is a notation on a card in the doctor's files dated September 6, 1956, that Pasquale 'was to have an x-ray of the stomach if heartburn continued.' Dr. Lentino himself testified that on September 6, 1956, 'he felt that if Mr. Pasquale's heartburn continued, after he went back on his diet and continued to take gelusil, that good sound medical practice would be to have an x-ray taken of this man's stomach * * *.' Following a fall by Pasquale in 1957 and a skull X-ray, the doctor 'did nothing concerning * * * (Pasquale's) stomach condition because after having a blow on the head and possible concussion, it would have been poor judgment to subject him to any elaborate physical procedure * * *.' While Pasquale was in the hospital after his fall, the doctor determined that there was no serious complaint at that time about his stomach and did not order X-rays on the ground 'that an x-ray at this time could not have ascertained the cause of his stomach complaint in his opinion.' Pasquale again visited the doctor on April 5, 1957, complaining of heartburn and the doctor 'ordered him to continue on his medication and go back on his diet and at this time, he told him that after he had been on his diet for a period of time, if he did not receive relief from his antacids, he was to let him know and he would take some x-rays.' The doctor stated that on May 24, 1957, he was not of the opinion that an X-ray was 'sound medical practice for this patient.' Almost a year elapsed before he saw Pasquale again in April of 1958, at which time 'he never asked Mr. Pasquale further about x-rays at the Clinton Hospital, he did not think that they were necessary.' At about this time Pasquale's son David was told by his father that Dr. Lentino had said that X-rays might be taken but did not indicate 'exactly when.' In November, 1958, the doctor submitted a report to the Department of Public Welfare in which he classified Pasquale's ailment as a 'duodenal ulcer' although Pasquale had no functioning duodenum and no ulcer. In April, 1959, in another public welfare report, the doctor represented that he had taken a 'GI series' of X-rays. The following year he filed a report with the Bureau of Old Age Assistance indicating that a 'GI series' had been done on Pasquale's 'GI tract' and in this 1960 report he stated Pasquale was suffering from 'GI bleeding from doudenal ulcer,' although at that time the plaintiff was experiencing no such bleeding. On three occasions in 1956 and 1957 the doctor's office cards relative to Pasquale contained notations relative to X-rays, including an appointment made for Pasquale at the Clinton Hospital which Pasquale did not keep. Dr. Chandler had previously testified that 'X-ray is the most important laboratory aid in the diagnosis of the disorders of the gastrointestinal tract.' Dr. Lentino, during this time, never checked Pasquale's weight or tested his stools.

In June, 1961, Pasquale's son took him to Dr. Rudolph Utzschneider at the Fallon Clinic in Worcester. Dr. Utzschneider noted Pasquale's complaints, examined him, and recommended that he go to the hospital. In the hospital Dr. Utzschneider ordered X-rays, which revealed the presence of a foreign body in the patient's left side. The object was removed in an operation on July 26, 1961, and proved to be a rusted and broken Kelly clamp. The clamp had lodged within two portions of the patient's intestine and the two portions had become joined together by 'dense, congestive fibrous tissue.' According to a pathologist, the portions of the large intestine 'in the immediate proximity to the clamp were chronically inflamed and congested.' Pasquale improved somewhat following the operation but then his condition worsened and he died on September 3, 1961. A postmortem examination demonstrated that Pasquale had suffered from several problems, including multiple abdominal abcesses. Dr. Utzschneider assigned as the causes of death '(g)eneralized arteriosclerosis, pulmonary emboli and peritonitis.' The death certificate carried the cause of death as 'Multiple abcesses of the abdomen.? Days.'

This action was brought on February 21, 1962, five and one-half months after Nunzio Pasquale's death, seven months after the discovery of the clamp by X-ray, and six years, four months after the original operation.

1. The principal defence raised by both defendants was that the statutes of limitation had run. The relevant statute concerning wrongful death was G.L. c. 229, § 2C, and read in part as follows: '(A) person who by his negligence * * * causes the death of a person * * * shall be liable in damages * * * to be recovered in an action of tort, commenced * * * within two years after the injury which caused the death * * *.' In these circumstances the wrongful death action is foreclosed as against both defendants. The operation, i.e., the injury, was on October 22, 1955; the action was brought by writ dated February 21, 1962. See Burns's Case, 218 Mass. 8, 12, 105 N.E. 601; Crosby v. Boston Elev. Ry., 238 Mass. 564, 565--566, 131 N.E. 206; Murphy v. Avery Chem. Co., 240 Mass. 150, 153, 133 N.E. 92; Sterling v. Frederick Leyland & Co., Ltd., 242 Mass. 8, 13, 136 N.E. 60.

2. The statute of limitations concerning malpractice which was in force at the commencement of this action was G.L. c. 260, § 4. It read in relevant part as follows: '(A)ctions of contract or tort for malpractice, error or mistake against physicians, surgeons * * * shall be commenced only within two years next after the cause of action accrues.'

Capucci v. Barone, 266 Mass. 578, 581, 165 N.E. 653, 654, was an action against a surgeon who had left a sponge in the patient's abdominal cavity during an operation. The operation had taken place more than two years before the date on which the plaintiffs' writs were brought. In interpreting G.L. c. 260, § 4, this court held that the claim of malpractice was barred on the ground that the statutory period begins to run at the time of the operation 'and not when the actual damage results or is ascertained.' This definition of 'accrues' was relied upon in Maloney v. Brackett, 275 Mass. 479, 481, 176 N.E. 604, and has frequently been cited in similar cases in other States. 1

Were it not for recent legislation, we would be disposed to reconsider the question of the time from which the statute starts to run in the light of the growing body of case law at odds with the Capucci doctrine which computed ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Berry v. Branner
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 28, 1966
    ...Meckley, 284 F.2d 797 (CA6 N.Div.Ohio 1960).3 Waldman v. Rohrbaugh, 241 Md. 137, 215 A.2d 825, 830 (1966); Pasquale v. Chandler, 1966 Mass.Adv.Sh. 475, 215 N.E.2d 319, 322 (1966); Morgan v. Grace Hospital, 149 W.Va. 783, 144 S.E.2d 156, 162 (1965). See 16 Clev.Mar.L.Rev. (1) 65, 71 (1967); ......
  • Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 17, 2006
    ...509 (1979); Franklin v. Albert, 381 Mass. 611, 617-620, 411 N.E.2d 458 (1980) (tort discovery rule), overruling Pasquale v. Chandler, 350 Mass. 450, 458, 215 N.E.2d 319 (1966). 1. I agree with the court's analysis of the preemption issue. at 795-797, 840 N.E.2d at 2. Enterprise submitted af......
  • Wyler v. Tripi
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • February 24, 1971
    ...not only legislated, but of having done so directly in the face of a clear and opposite legislative intent. Cf. Pasquale v. Chandler (1966), 350 Mass. 450, 215 N.E.2d 319. Statutes of limitation are designed to assure an end to litigation and to establish a state of stability and repose. It......
  • Flanagan v. Mount Eden General Hospital
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 17, 1969
    ...rule with a five-year outer limit, merely extended the existing Statute of Limitations from two years to three years (Pasquale v. Chandler, 350 Mass. 450, 215 N.E.2d 319). On the other hand, in 1966, the Supreme Court of Oregon adopted the discovery rule for malpractice actions, overruling ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT