Beecher v. Wallace, 21376.
| Decision Date | 10 August 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 21376.,21376. |
| Citation | 381 F.2d 372 |
| Parties | John BEECHER, Appellant, v. George C. WALLACE, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Thorne, Stanton, Clopton, Herz, Stanek & Steinberg, San Jose, Cal., for appellant.
Faber Johnston, Johnston & Miller, Burnett, Burnett, Keogh & Cali, San Jose, Cal., for appellee.
Before HAMLEY and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and MATHES,* Senior District Judge.
The sole question in this case is whether a summons issued in a state court at the time of the commencement of the action has any legal effect when served on one of several defendants after a co-defendant has removed the action to the federal courts. Stated differently, does a state court summons issued but not served prior to removal of the state court action to the federal courts retain any efficacy for further service of process after the removal? The district court concluded that it does not. We agree.
28 U.S.C. § 1448 provides in part:
"In all cases removed from any State court to any district court of the United States in which any one or more of the defendants has not been served with process or in which the service has not been perfected prior to removal, or in which process served proves to be defective, such process or service may be completed or new process issued in the same manner as in cases originally filed in such district court."
A careful reading of the statute discloses that the statute contemplates three separate situations: (1) where a defendant has not been served at all with state process prior to removal; (2) where a defendant has been served prior to removal but the service has not been perfected in accord with state law at the date of removal; (3) where a defendant has been served prior to removal but the summons contains some formal defect on its face.
The purpose of process is to give the addressee notice of the proceeding against him. Thus service of process (in the absence of a voluntary appearance or a conscious waiver) is an indispensable prerequisite to the court's jurisdiction to proceed. If, as in the first case above, the defendant has not been served at all, the state court never acquires jurisdiction over him. However, in both the second and third cases, the defendant, having been served, has been put on notice of the pending action. Consequently, the existence of an irregularity on the face of the summons, or the failure to perfect the service in accord with state law does not necessarily deprive the state court of jurisdiction.
Section 1448 recognizes this distinction. Some states provide that service of process shall not be deemed complete until a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vasquez v. North County Transit Dist.
...of this case, the City could have perfected service through compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Beecher v. Wallace, 381 F.2d 372, 373 (9th Cir.1967). However, Rule 4(m) provides, in relevant If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days ......
-
Allen v. Ferguson
...be completed or new process to be issued in the same manner as in cases originally filed in federal district court. See Beecher v. Wallace, 381 F.2d 372 (9th Cir.1967); Freight Terminals, Inc. v. Ryder Systems, Inc., 461 F.2d 1046 (5th In Walker, 335 F.2d at 539, the Fifth Circuit, quoting ......
-
CMB Infrastructure Grp. IX, LP v. Cobra Energy Inv. Fin., Inc.
...filed in such district court.")98 Nat'l S.S. Co. v. Tugman , 106 U.S. 118, 122, 1 S.Ct. 58, 27 L.Ed. 87 (1882).99 Beecher v. Wallace , 381 F.2d 372, 373 (9th Cir. 1967) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1448 ).100 Greenfield Advisors, LLC v. Salas , 733 F. App'x 364, 367 (9th Cir. 2018).101 ECF No. 60 at......
-
Amen v. City of Dearborn
...and Joiners, 438 F.2d 176, 180 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 858, 92 S.Ct. 110, 30 L.Ed.2d 99 (1971); Beecher v. Wallace, 381 F.2d 372 (9th Cir. 1967); Surowitz v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 376 F.Supp. 369, 372 Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d) governs the service of process, pro......