Sneed v. Mayo
Decision Date | 31 July 1953 |
Citation | 66 So.2d 865 |
Parties | SNEED v. MAYO. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Bill Sneed, in pro. per.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Bart L. Cohen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
This is an original habeas corpus proceeding which originated in this Court when the petitioner, who is a prisoner at the State Prison Farm, sent the following letter to one of the Justices:
'Honorable Sir:
'On May 13th, 1952, in the Palm Beach County Criminal Court of Record, I was tried for an alleged offense of Breaking and Entering with intent to commit Larceny.
'After finding me guilty, Judge Newall sentenced me to serve five (5) years in the state prison. Your Honor, I am poor and uneducated, hardly able to read or write and a friend is helping me to prepare this letter seeking your help. I am but 21 years of age and have never before appeared in a Court of law.
'At the time of my arraignment before Judge Newall, I told him truthfully that I was not guilty of the criminal charge. Also, I informed the Court of my age and my ignorance, that I was completely uneducated and unfamiliar with legal matters or procedures. I explained that I was unable to defend myself and requested that counsel be appointed to represent me. I told Judge Newall that I was a pauper, unable to secure a lawyer and unable to get any help from any other source. Judge Newall told me that I would not need a lawyer because he would try me without a jury and would take care of my defense. I told him that I would much rather have a jury trial because I was not guilty. I did not waive a jury and objected to trial without jury.
'However, on May 13th, I was forced to trial without a lawyer and without a jury, over my objections. It is my understanding that a denial of jury trial was a denial of my constitutional rights, and that to try an ignorant, uneducated youth like myself was depriving me of a fair and impartial trial. I now understand that a judgment of guilt predicated thereon is void and my sentence of imprisonment illegal. Accordingly, will Your Honor please look over the enclosed certified copies of Information, Judgment, Sentence and trial court minutes. They show no jury, no counsel, and no waiver of either.
'If I am entitled to relief by judicial process, will Your Honor please treat this letter as a formal application for whatever procedure is appropriate to the circumstances?
'Thank you very much.
'Most respectfully yours,
/s/ Bill Sneed'
Bill Sneed Attached to the letter was a certified copy of the minutes of the court in which the petitioner was convicted which read, in part, as follows:
'The Criminal Court of Record in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, convened on this 13th day of May, 1952, May Term, at 9:23 A.M., by Order of the Court with the Honorable Edward G. Newell, Judge of said Court present and presiding.
'Other Court Officials present were: T. Harold Williams, County Solicitor, L. H. Brannon, Assistant County Solicitor, J. Louie Carter, Clerk, Margaret L. Rogers, Deputy Clerk, C. B. Bowen, M. H. Partin, W. S. Bateman, and Emery Pickren, Deputy Sheriffs, and C. E. Jones, Court Reporter.
State of Florida
v.
'This case having been previously set for trial before the Court without a jury at this time, comes now the State of Florida, by L. H. Brannon, Assistant County Solicitor and the defendant, Bill Sneed.
'At this time, the State Witnesses and Defendant were duly sworn according to law and the rule invoked.
'C. E. Jones, Court Reporter, was present for this case.
'Whereupon, Mrs. Charles W. Hoeffer, Edward Eberhardt, R. C. Croft, S. G. Roddick, Roy Cowart, Coleman Goodman, James S. Grantham, Lillian Anderson, Ira Partridge, Mrs. Wayne Morgan, Mary Bishop Walker, and Preston Wright testified in behalf of the State.
'Thereupon, R. C. Croft was recalled to testify in the behalf of the State.
'Whereupon the defendant testified in his own behalf.
'Thereupon, Preston Wright was recalled to testify in behalf of the State.
'The Court having heard all the facts of this case and having duly considered the same, It is Ordered by the Court that the defendant herein do be adjudged Guilty.
'The defendant was then asked if he had anything further to say before sentence was pronounced and he saying nothing in bar or preclusion, the following sentence was then pronounced.
'Now, Therefore You, Bill Sneed, Having Been Adjudged Guilty of the crime of Breaking And Entering with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: Grand Larceny, as charged in the information filed herein, are adjudged by the Court to be guilty thereof, and for the crime for which you do now stand guilty and convicted, it is the judgment of the Court and the Sentence of the Law, that for your said offense, that you do be taken in custody by the Sheriff of Palm Beach County, Florida, and there be confined at hard labor for a period of Five (5) Years. * * *'
Although the informal communication sent by the prisoner to one of the Justices did not conform with the requirements of section 79.01, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A., governing applications for writs of habeas corpus, this Court, as it has done on occasions in the past where applicants without means have suggested serious constitutional question, treated the communication as sufficient and issued the writ of habeas corpus.
In due course the Honorable Nathan Mayo, as prison custodian of the State of Florida, filed his answer to the writ, which contained the following admissions, denials and recitals:
* * *'
Attached to the return was a certified copy of the testimony taken at the trial of the defendant. Also attached, as Exhibit I to the return, was an affidavit made by the judge who presided at the trial of the petitioner, which contained the following material averments:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Banks v. Jones
... ... he is incarcerated, for the simple reason that the very nature of the writ is to test solely the legality of the petitioner's imprisonment[.] Sneed v. Mayo, 66 So.2d 865, 86970 (Fla.1953) (holding The great [writ] of habeas corpus is a writ of right obtainable under our Constitution by all ... ...
-
Crane v. Hayes
... ... State,123 Fla. 143, 166 So. 467 (1936). An informal communication has been held to be a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Sneed v. Mayo, 66 So.2d 865 (Fla.1953). And pleadings not styled habeas corpus have been given legal effect as such where justice and the circumstances so ... ...
-
Pompey v. Cochran
... ... Baker, 152 Fla. 274, 275, 11 So.2d 578, 579 (1943) ... As stated in Anglin v. Mayo, 88 So.2d 918 (Fla.1956): ... Page 1011 ... The writ] is as old as the common law itself and is an integral part of our own democratic process ... Id. at 919-20. The court also noted in Sneed v. Mayo, 66 So.2d 865 (Fla.1953): ... "Jurisdiction of the person and of the subject matter is not alone conclusive [and] the jurisdiction of the ... ...
-
Banks v. Jones
... ... See Sneed v. Mayo , 66 So.2d 865, 869 (Fla. 1953) ("The great writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right obtainable under our Constitution by all men who claim ... ...