U.S. Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 15-1338

• Decision Date: 06 December 2016
• Docket Number: No. 15-1338,15-1338
• Citation: 842 F.3d 1271
• Parties: United States Postal Service, Petitioner v. Postal Regulatory Commission, Respondent Gamefly, Inc., Intervenor
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit

842 F.3d 1271

United States Postal Service, Petitioner
v.
Postal Regulatory Commission, Respondent

Gamefly, Inc., Intervenor

No. 15-1338

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued November 9, 2016
Decided December 6, 2016

David C. Belt, Attorney, U.S. Postal Service, argued the cause for petitioner. Stephan J. Boardman, Chief Counsel, entered an appearance.

Henry C. Whitaker, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were

842 F.3d 1272

Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Michael S. Raab, Attorney, David A. Trissell, General Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, and Christopher J. Laver, and Anne J. Siarnacki, Deputy General Counsels.

Before: ROGERS and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges, and SILBERMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Under the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, Pub. L. No. 109-435, 120 Stat. 3198 (2006), the rates charged by the United States Postal Service for its products are determined primarily according to their classification as either "market-dominant" or "competitive." Subject to conditions, a product is competitive unless "the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively set the price of such product substantially above costs, raise prices significantly, decrease quality, or decrease output, without risk of losing a significant level of business to other firms offering similar products." 39 U.S.C. § 3642(b)(1). Market-dominant products are subject to rate regulation by the Postal Regulatory Commission, id. § 3622(a), which entails a price cap that cannot rise more than the rate of inflation in any year, id. § 3622(d)(1). Competitive products are subject only to requirements that effectively set a price floor. See 39 U.S.C. § 3633(a).

In the instant case, the Postal Service petitions for review, contending the Commission's action denying its parcel reclassification request was arbitrary and capricious, see 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), for failing to acknowledge, much less explain, its decision to depart from precedent granting similar requests. It does not seek review of the denial of the request to transfer the "keys and identification devices" product to the competitive category. We grant the petition.

I.

In 2011, the Commission approved the reclassification of commercial Standard Mail Parcels as competitive. Order No. 689, Order Conditionally Granting Request to Transfer Commercial Standard Mail Parcels to the Competitive Product List , Docket No. MC2010-36, at 20 (P.R.C. Mar. 2, 2011). It did so based largely on the Postal Service's estimate of its share of the under one-pound parcel market, which, when compared to the market shares of "formidable competitors" UPS and FedEx, "demonstrated that the ground shipping market is competitive." Id. at 14, 16. The Commission granted the request over opposition from the Parcel Shippers Association, id. at 10, and despite the Postal Service's inability to provide an estimate of the likely impact that a significant price increase would have on its market share, id. at 15.

One month later, the Commission approved the reclassification of commercial First-Class Mail Parcels as competitive. Order No. 710, Order Adding Lightweight Commercial Parcels to the Competitive Product List , Docket No. MC2011-22, at 11 (P.R.C. Apr. 6, 2011). In its request, the Postal Service had identified three different segments of the under one-pound parcel market (two-to-three day air; consolidator ground; and commercial carrier ground). Id. at 5. It acknowledged that it had captured most of the two-to-three day air segment, but estimated that its competitors' consolidator ground services made up about 33% of the total market, and commercial ground carriers made up about 20%. Id. at 5-6. Based on the Postal Service's own market share estimates of 44% (by volume) and 34% (by revenue), the Commission found "significant competition

842 F.3d 1273

in the marketplace" and approved the request. Id. at 6, 11.

The following year, the Commission approved the reclassification of the single-piece Parcel Post product—a ground delivery service for...