YOUNGSTOWN S. & T. CO. v. Rev. Bd., ESD

Citation116 N.E.2d 650,124 Ind. App. 273
Decision Date15 January 1954
Docket Number399.,No. 18,18
PartiesYOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE COMPANY v. REVIEW BOARD OF THE INDIANA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION ETC., ET AL.
CourtCourt of Appeals of Indiana

Allen P. Twyman, of East Chicago, for appellant.

Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General, William S. McMasters, Deputy Attorney General, Counsel for all appellees except George Bon. Samuel Ruff, of East Chicago, and Jay E. Darlington, of Hammond, for appellee George Bon.

KENDALL, P.J.

Appellant brings this appeal from a decision of the Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division under § 52-1542 (k), Burns' 1951 Replacement.

Appellee George Bon, hereafter referred to as the claimant, had been an employee of the appellant for thirty-four years and voluntarily retired March 30, 1952, to accept benefits of a pension plan existing in accordance with the bargaining agreement between appellant and the bargaining agent for the claimant. The claimant made application for unemployment benefits on March 31, 1952. A hearing was held by the Claims Deputy which resulted in a decision in favor of the claimant. The Claims Deputy was sustained by the Appeals Referee who held that the claimant was available for work and was physically able to work and therefore eligible for benefits under § 1403 of the Unemployment Security Act of 1947, being § 52-1538 (b), Burns' 1951 Replacement. The decision of the Appeals Referee was then appealed to the Full Board which held that the claimant was available for work during the period in question, to-wit: May 18, 1952, to August 26, 1952, and entitled to benefit rights subject, however, to being reduced weekly by the amounts he received under the employer's pension plan.

The appellant appeals to this court assigning as the only error that the decision of the Review Board is contrary to law.

The question presented by the issues thus formed is whether appellee George Bon was available for work within the meaning of the Indiana Employment Act.

This is a companion case to # 18,398 in this court between the same parties and factually both cases concern the unemployment benefits of Mr. Bon. In cause # 18,398, the Review Board rendered its Findings and Conclusions in part as follows:

"`The Review Board further finds that when a claimant voluntarily retires from his employment, it is presumed, until the contrary is established, that such claimant intends to permanently leave the labor market.
"`The Review Board further finds that the claimant failed to appear at the Referee Hearing to offer evidence as to his ability and availability for work.
"`The Review Board therefore finds that the claimant was unavailable for work and ineligible for his benefit rights on March 30, 1952, to May 8, 1952, the date of his hearing before the Referee, ...'"

which decision of the Review Board this court affirmed.

The decision of the Review Board pertinent to a determination in this case in part is as follows:

"`The Review Board finds that the claimant, a man seventy years of age was employed by the employer involved herein from April, 1918 to March 30, 1952; and that on the latter date he was retired in accordance with a pension plan of the employer.
"`The Review Board further finds that the claimant received a monthly pension of $45.20 from this employer.
"`The Review Board further finds that from May 18, 1952 to August 26, 1952, the period involved herein, the claimant, in addition to registering for work made a reasonable effort to secure work.
"`The Review Board further finds that taking into consideration the claimant's age and physical capacity, he has placed no undue restrictions upon his employability; that he has made a reasonable effort to secure work and that he has been available for work during the period from May 18, 1952 to August 26, 1952.
"`The Review Board further finds that the claimant's monthly pension from the employer reduced to a weekly basis equals $10.57; and that his weekly benefit amount should be reduced accordingly.
"`Decision:
"`The Review Board holds that the claimant was available for work during the period involved herein and entitled to his benefit rights, subject to being reduced by $10.57 weekly, the amount of his pension under the pension plan of this employer.'"

This court is therefore presented with the question of whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of the Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division that the appellee, George Bon, was entitled to benefits of the Indiana Employment Security Act for the period of May 18, 1952 to August 26, 1952.

The evidence shows that the claimant was looking for a job but could not get one; that he was seventy years of age; that at the time he retired from appellant's corporation he had smashed fingers and was doing sweeping and cleaning, but other than the finger injury he had no physical ailment; that he filed his claim for benefits on March 31, 1952; that he sought employment at small bowling alleys, restaurants and retail stores; that he had asked for clean-up and janitor jobs but that a lot of people were out of work; that he did not know the names of the people whom he had contacted for employment; that he could not get a factory job on account of his age but was able to do light work; that the claimant could not identify the places where he sought employment; that he did not attend the first hearing (# 18,398) although he received notices and letters but did not know what they were. There was evidence by a Claims Deputy that the record showed two names of people the claimant contacted for employment which claimant gave when he registered for work but that in addition he had contacted small grocery stores. The Appeals Referee took judicial knowledge that during the period in question there was in progress in the city where c...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Williamson Co. v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec. Division
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • September 10, 1969
    ...N.E.2d 541 (1969); Dormeyer Industries v. Review Board etc., 133 Ind.App. 500, 183 N.E.2d 351 (1962); Youngstown S. & T. Co. v. Rev. Bd., E.S.D., 124 Ind.App. 273, 116 N.E.2d 650 (1954). Each of these exceptions, if established by the appellant in a given case, can provide the basis for rev......
  • Dormeyer Industries v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Sec. Division, 19665
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • June 21, 1962
    ...295, 55 N.E.2d 121. * * *' 120 Ind.App. p. 111, 90 N.E.2d p. 525. Also in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division, et al. (1954), 124 Ind.App. 273, 116 N.E.2d 650, this court said: '* * * It is a well-recognized rule of law that in matte......
  • Puckett v. Review Bd. of Indiana Employment Security Division
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • December 9, 1980
    ...and binding so long as supported by substantial evidence of probative value. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security Division, (1954) 124 Ind.App. 273, 116 N.E.2d 650. Puckett's presence at employer premises was required 8 hours per day, 40 hours per week.......
  • Dooley v. Richard's Standard Service
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • October 16, 1969
    ... ... Youngstown Sheet & Tube ... Co. v. Review Bd. of Ind., E.S.D. (1954), 124 Ind.App. 273, 116 N.E.2d 650 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT