Abbate v. State, 98-4237.
Decision Date | 27 October 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 98-4237.,98-4237. |
Citation | 745 So.2d 409 |
Parties | Joseph ABBATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Donnie Murrell, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph A. Tringali, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Defendant argues that the state's information charged him only with violations under subsection (1), (3) and (4) of section 800.04 but that the trial judge instructed on—and the jury found him guilty of—a violation under subsection (2). He also contends that the judge improperly admitted collateral crimes evidence. We agree and reverse.
The facts and circumstances regarding the issue relating to the crimes charged are identical to those in O'Bryan v. State, 692 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). As there, the information in this case charged violations under other parts of section 800.04 but said nothing that could reasonably be interpreted as an alleged violation of subsection (2), relating to simulated sexual intercourse. As the O'Bryan court said:
692 So.2d at 291. Essentially defendant was convicted of a crime not charged. That is fundamental error.
We also conclude that the admission of "other crimes" evidence was improper. § 90.404(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997) (). It is apparent beyond any doubt that the state sought by the introduction of this evidence to corroborate the credibility of the complaining witnesses. As the state acknowledges, however, there are no familial contacts present in this case. See Heuring v. State, 513 So.2d 122 (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Braggs v. State, 3D00-1315.
...error by convicting a defendant on a crime not charged. Taylor v. State, 760 So.2d 298 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Abbate v. State, 745 So.2d 409, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). Moreover, "[b]ecause the court instructed the jury on a crime not charged, the resulting verdict is a nullity." Abbate, 745 So......
-
Taylor v. State, 4D99-254.
...is well established that a trial court commits fundamental error by convicting a defendant on a crime not charged. Abbate v. State, 745 So.2d 409, 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). A trial court also commits fundamental error when it instructs the jury on an alternative theory which was not charged ......
- Debonis v. State, 98-4396.