Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose Junior College, 50296

Decision Date03 October 1978
Docket NumberNo. 50296,50296
Citation586 P.2d 1098,1978 OK 129
CourtOklahoma Supreme Court
PartiesW. Rogers ABBOTT II, for himself and on Behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Appellants, v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF OSCAR ROSE JUNIOR COLLEGE, and the members thereof, Joe B. Barnes, Chairman, William G. Bernhardt, John Conrad, J. B. Estes, Don Reynolds, Toney M. Webber, Cecil Parham, County Clerk of Oklahoma County, Don Wilson, County Assessor of Oklahoma County, and Jack Blackwell, County Treasurer of Oklahoma County, Appellees.

Appeal from the District Court, Oklahoma County; Homer Smith, Trial judge.

A dependent school district was annexed to an independent school district. At time of annexation, the real property within the annexing independent school district was subject to levy and assessment of taxes for a community maintaining a community junior college which community had become an area technical school district. Based on that annexation, real property within the annexed district was made subject to the area school district levy. A real property owner within the annexed school district sought to enjoin that levy and assessment as to real property within the annexed dependent school district. Trial court refused the injunction. Real property owner appeals.

AFFIRMED.

LeRoy A. Powers, Oklahoma City, for appellants.

Clark Hurd, pro se.

Edward H. Ferrish, Midwest City, for appellees.

Andrew M. Coats, Dist. Atty., Dist. Number Seven, Julia T. Brown, Asst. Dist. Atty., Oklahoma City, for appellees, Cecil Parham, Don Wilson, Jack Blackwell.

LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice:

W. Rogers Abbott II (Abbott), a landowner, sought to enjoin the levy and assessment of taxes for the benefit of Oscar Rose Junior College District, an area school district 1 (Oscar Rose), as against real property located within the territory of what was formerly Pleasant Hills School District in Oklahoma County, D-45. That dependent school district was annexed to Midwest City-Del City School District, I-52.

Trial was to the court and basically on stipulation by the parties. No principal facts are in dispute. Pleasant Hills School District, a dependent school district, was annexed to Midwest City-Del City School District, an independent school district. At time of annexation, the real property within the annexing school district was subject to levy and assessment of taxes for Oscar Rose Junior College District, an area school district. Based on the annexation of Pleasant Hills with Midwest City-Del City, real property within the annexed Pleasant Hills was made subject to the Oscar Rose assessment. Abbott, as a landowner in the annexed school district, sought an injunction to prevent enforcement of the Oscar Rose tax against real property located within the territory of the annexed dependent school district. The trial court refused the injunction. Abbott appealed.

Abbott argues (1) there must be compliance with 70 O.S.1971, § 4403(b) 2 for the territory within Pleasant Hills school district to be annexed to the community junior college school district; (2) Pleasant Hills school district electors have not voted on the levy as required by Okla.Const., art. 10, § 9B; (3) and position of the proponents of the tax violates 70 O.S.1971, § 4411, 3 for that argument allows control to be removed from State Regents of Higher Education and places it with the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education.

Proponents for the levy and assessment, appellees, contend (1) § 4410 4 controls and allows a community maintaining a community junior college to become an area school district (area technical school district) making 70 O.S.1971, § 14-108 5 applicable as to the annexing of territory in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education that provide the territory of an annexed school district becomes a part of an area school district if the annexing school district is a part of an area school district; 6 and (2) § 4411 is not applicable to Oscar Rose.

Oscar Rose was established as a community junior college under authority of 70 O.S.Supp.1967, §§ 4401 to 4409. An amendment to § 4403 in 1968 7 allowed additional territory to be annexed to the community and requires approval by the legal voters in the territory proposed to be annexed. Another 1968 Act, 8 of which § 1 is now § 4410, allowed a community maintaining a community junior college established under §§ 4401 to 4409 to become an area school district (area technical school district) and made applicable (to a community maintaining a community junior college becoming an area school district) the laws applicable to other area school districts, including laws authorizing tax levies and laws pertaining to eligibility for participation in federal funds. Section 2 of that same act, now § 4411, allowed any two-year college that is part of the State System of Higher Education to also become an area school district but the taxing authority granted to a community maintaining a community junior college was denied.

Oscar Rose, a community junior college, complied with § 4410. By so doing, the community maintaining that community junior college became an area school district with laws applicable to other area school districts also applicable to it except that the governing board remained the Board of Trustees of the community junior college rather than a board of education as provided to govern area school districts organized under § 14-108. Sub-section E, § 14-108 allows territory to be annexed to an area school district in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education. Those rules provide that with the annexing of territory by a dependent or independent school district already a part of an area school district then the territory of the annexed dependent or independent school district becomes a part of the area school district (area technical school district).

Here, Oscar Rose was organized as a community junior college. If its sole status had remained that of a community junior college, then annexation of additional territory could come only through § 4403 and Abbott would be correct. However, that junior college complied with § 4410 and the community maintaining it became an area school district. As an area school district, §§ 14-108 E is applicable. That sub-section allows annexation of territory to the area school district under the rules of the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education. Those rules make the territory of annexed dependent school district, Pleasant Hills, a part of the area school district, Oscar Rose, for the annexing independent school district, Midwest City-Del City, was already a part of the Oscar Rose area school district at the time of the annexation. In voting for the annexation, the electors voted to become a part of the Oscar Rose area school district. The tax was levied as authorized by an area school district and not as a community maintaining a community junior college. Legislative acts are to be construed in such manner as to reconcile the different provisions and render them consistent and harmonious, and give intelligent effect to each. Eason Oil Company v. Corporation Commission, Okl., 535 P.2d 283 (1975). Section 4403 applies to a community maintaining a community junior college. Section 4410, with its effect as to applicable law, applies to a community maintaining a community junior college that becomes an area school district thereunder. We find no conflict. We hold the territory of the annexed dependent school district is subject to the levied and assessed tax.

As previously observed, § 4410 was § 1 of Laws 1968, c. 278. It authorized a community maintaining a community junior college to become an area technical school district. Section 4411 was § 2 of that same law. It authorized a two-year college that is a part of the State System of Higher Education to become a similar area school district. The latter section refused the taxing authority or to affect control in the governing boards and the State Regents for Higher Education. In the present case, we need not consider § 4411, for it is not applicable to Oscar Rose as a part of the State System of Higher Education and as relating to operation as a technical area school district. Oscar Rose Junior College was authorized as an integral part of the State System of Higher Education under certain conditions. 70 O.S.Supp.1973, § 4423. However, subsection B of that section, and now both sub-sections B and C as amended by Laws 1974, c. 33, 9 continues the technical area school district in accordance with 70 O.S.1971, § 4410, and Not § 4411. The argument by Abbott, that use of rules prescribed by the State Board of Vocational and Technical Education on annexing territory as authorized by 70 O.S.1971, § 14-108 affects control as prohibited by § 4411, is not persuasive. Oscar Rose Junior College as a member of the State System continues its operation as a technical area school district in accordance with § 4410.

Affirmed.

WILLIAMS, IRWIN, BERRY, BARNES, SIMMS and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

1 The entity and officials sought to be enjoined, and who are now appellees, are: The Board of Truste...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Ethics Com'n v. Keating
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • May 5, 1998
    ...724 (1845). 38 See Inexco Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission, 1981 OK 44, p 10, 628 P.2d 362, 365; Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose Junior College, 1978 OK 129, 586 P.2d 1098, 1101. 39 See Art. 29 § 3(A), Okl. 40 See Turpen, supra note 34; Ricks Exploration Company, supra note 34; C......
  • Holleyman v. Holleyman
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • May 13, 2003
    ... ... 14, 846 P.2d 1097, 1102 n. 14 ; Board of Law Library Trustees of Oklahoma County v ... of Tulsa, 1998 OK 2, ? 9, 953 P.2d 329 ; Abbott ... Board of Trustees of Oscar ... Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose ... ...
  • McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 87119
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • January 13, 1998
    ...dealing with the same subject together as a harmonious whole so as to give effect to each provision. Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose, Etc., 586 P.2d 1098 (Okl.1978). To accomplish this goal it is proper to consider the history and consistent purpose of the legislation on the subje......
  • South Tulsa v. Arkansas River Bridge Auth.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • January 22, 2008
    ... ...         The trustees shall negotiate a contract or contracts to ... contract, it will be necessary for the board of trustees of such trust to obtain the consent ... Comm'n, 1986 OK 34, ¶ 33, 725 P.2d 278; Abbott v. Board of Trustees of Oscar Rose Junior ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT