Abrams v. General Ins. Co., Inc., 84-1848
| Decision Date | 18 December 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-1848,84-1848 |
| Citation | 460 So.2d 572,10 Fla. L. Weekly 69 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 69 Carol A. ABRAMS, Appellant, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and South Carolina Insurance Company, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
George C. Vogelsang and Deborah White, Miami, for appellant.
Joe N. Unger, Miami, Kopplow & Flynn, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
Plaintiff appeals an order dismissing her defamation action for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse.
It is axiomatic that when considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action, the court must confine itself strictly to the allegations within the four corners of the complaint, and must accept all well-pleaded allegations as true. Consideration of defendant's affirmative defenses or sufficiency of evidence which plaintiff will likely produce on the merits is wholly irrelevant and immaterial to deciding such a motion. Parkway General Hospital, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 393 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Accord Kaufman v. A-1 Bus Lines, Inc., 363 So.2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
In the present case, the alleged defamatory letter states that there appears to be a violation of section 627.409, Florida Statutes (1981), and then proceeds to quote that section in its entirety. 1 The letter then states Our file indicates that your son, Ronald Frank Abrams, is, in fact, a driver of the vehicle shown on our policy. This information was withheld in Sections II and III of your Application for Insurance dated 10/21/82.
If the General Insurance Company had been supplied with the proper information, i.e., that Ronald Frank Abrams, is, in fact, a driver of the vehicle we insure, the policy would have been issued at a substantially higher premium based on his record and his date of birth.
In view of the violation of the Statute, which denied General Insurance Company the information to properly evaluate the application, we hereby decline to provide any insurance coverage for this accident.
The defendant contends that the words attributed to it are not reasonably susceptible of the defamatory meaning contended for by plaintiff. Undoubtedly this was the basis on which the trial court dismissed the action, and it is with some reluctance that we take a different position. We find, however, that it is possible that persons reading the alleged defamatory letter might take it to mean that plaintiff was guilty of misrepresentation in the acquisition of her insurance policy. See Wolfson v. Kirk, 273 So.2d 774, 778 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 279 So.2d 32 (Fla.1973).
Accepting all well-pleaded allegations in the complaint as true, and construing them in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as we must, we find plaintiff has adequately stated a cause of action for defamation. Accordingly, the order dismissing the defamation action is reversed and the cause remanded for further...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fuente Cigar, Ltd. v. Opus One, 96-2389-CIV-T-24 (E).
...that is incompatible with lawful business, and so a rational trier of fact could find them defamatory. See also Abrams v. General Ins. Co., 460 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Opus One does not appear to deny that a reasonable trier of fact could find the statements made by its representative......
-
Susan Fixel, Inc. v. Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc.
...and immaterial to deciding such a motion. Barbado v. Green & Murphy, P.A., 758 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Abrams v. General Ins. Co., 460 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Parkway Gen. Hosp., Inc. v. Allstate, Ins. Co., 393 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA Casting the allegations of the Third Amend......
-
Gowan v. Bay County, 99-206.
...pleading, unless it is apparent that the pleading cannot be amended to state a cause of action.'"); Abrams v. General Insurance Co., Inc., 460 So.2d 572, 573 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). An opportunity to amend the complaint should be freely granted and should not be denied unless the privilege has ......
-
Alvarez v. E & A Produce Corp., s. 97-1205
...to the four corners of the complaint and must accept all well-pleaded allegations as true. See, e.g., Abrams v. General Ins. Co., 460 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Whether a prima facie case has been pled depends on the sufficiency of the plaintiff's allegations of fact, excluding the bare ......