Adler v. Adler, s. 81-1269

Decision Date02 March 1982
Docket NumberNos. 81-1269,81-1270 and 81-1271,s. 81-1269
Citation418 So.2d 1007
PartiesLeonard ADLER, Appellant, v. Stephen Paul ADLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dorothy E. Adler, Deceased, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard H. W. Maloy, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman, Greer & Weil and Bertha Claire Lee and Ray H. Pearson, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

Dorothy and Leonard Adler were divorced in October, 1978 after thirty-eight years of marriage. Due to Dorothy's declining health, the proceedings were bifurcated with jurisdiction retained by the trial court to determine property rights, alimony, attorney's fees and costs. Mrs. Adler died in November, 1978 and her son (appellee herein), as personal representative of her estate, was substituted in her place. Thereafter, Mr. Adler moved to amend his answer to assert a counterclaim alleging a special equity in jointly held assets, but the motion was denied. 1

Mr. Adler now seeks review of various provisions of the final judgment. The majority of the contentions raised fall within the trial court's discretion and may not be overturned by this court. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977). With the exception of one error in the order to which appellee has confessed, the judgment is affirmed. This error and the attorney's fee award require some discussion.

The trial court's award of $40,000 in attorney's fees to his wife is challenged by Mr. Adler on the basis that her ability to pay for this service was equal to or greater than his. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's award. One spouse need not be completely unable to pay attorney's fees before the other spouse may be required to pay such fees. Canakaris v. Canakaris, supra; Wilds v. Wilds, 399 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Nor do we find the amount of fees excessive in light of the results achieved and the respective financial circumstances of the parties. Posner v. Posner, 315 So.2d 175 (Fla.1975); Meltzer v. Meltzer, 400 So.2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980).

Mr. Adler also alleges that his wife's estate is not a "party" within the terms of Section 61.16, Florida Statutes, so as to be entitled to an award of fees for services rendered. We disagree. Under this statute, a party entitled to an award of attorney's fees must be one who is either obligated by a dissolution judgment to pay certain sums to the other party, or to receive payment from the other party. Price v. Price, 382 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). As can readily be seen, Mrs. Adler's estate was bound by the final judgment of dissolution, in this case, to receive payment from the other party. Upon Mrs. Adler's death, her personal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Rosen v. Rosen
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 24 Abril 1997
    ...of the lodestar formula reconfirmed that the results obtained is still a factor to be considered in awarding fees); Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)(amount of fees not excessive in light of results achieved and the respective financial circumstances of the parties); Meltzer......
  • Mintzer v. Mintzer
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 26 Abril 1988
    ...(Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Aronovitz v. Aronovitz, 439 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 450 So.2d 485 (Fla.1984); Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Bregman v. Bregman, 388 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Fagan v. Fagan, 381 So.2d 278, 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Bullar......
  • Hirsch v. Hirsch, 87-1455
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 27 Enero 1988
    ...See also Irwin v. Irwin, 455 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), and Knott v. Knott, 395 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). In Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) this principle was applied in a bifurcated divorce case where the wife died after dissolution but before the determination......
  • Rogers v. Cooper
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 Febrero 1991
    ...by the final judgment of dissolution to receive payment. See Price v. Price, 382 So.2d 433 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Adler v. Adler, 418 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Although the majority correctly points out that the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) has considerable auth......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Attorneys' fees and costs
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Family Law and Practice - Volume 1
    • 30 Abril 2022
    ...where motion for fees filed ATTORNEYS’ FEES. COSTS 17-35 Attorneys’ Fees and Costs §17:78 prior to party’s death); Adler v. Adler, 418 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (in bifurcated dissolution case, wife died after dissolution but before determination of property rights; court concluded tha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT