Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Leach

Decision Date16 April 1985
Docket NumberNo. 41834,41834
Citation254 Ga. 265,330 S.E.2d 596
PartiesAETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. v. LEACH.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Alexander J. Repasky, Repasky & Minin, Atlanta, for Terry leach.

Gregory T. Presmanes, Cone, Shivers & Presmanes, Atlanta, for Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

BELL, Justice.

When Terry Leach failed to appear at the call of his lawsuit for trial, counsel for defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. (hereinafter, Aetna) moved to dismiss his complaint. The superior court granted the motion, dismissing the complaint "with prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-41(b)." The Court of Appeals reversed, on the ground that, under the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 9-11-41(b), Ga.L.1982, p. 784 (eff. Nov. 1, 1982), trial courts are no longer authorized by § 9-11-41(b) to enter dismissals with prejudice for the failure of the plaintiff to prosecute. Leach v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 172 Ga.App. 785, 324 S.E.2d 494 (1984). We granted Aetna's application for a writ of certiorari, in order to review the holding of the Court of Appeals. For the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals' opinion, we agree with the court's holding, and affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Wallick v. Period Homes, Ltd.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 30 Octubre 2001
    ...See Leach v. Aetna Cas. &c. Co., 172 Ga.App. 785, 786, 324 S.E.2d 494 (1984) (on motion for rehearing), aff'd, Aetna Cas. &c. Co. v. Leach, 254 Ga. 265, 330 S.E.2d 596 (1985). 22. See Chandler v. Samford Univ., 35 F.Supp.2d 861, 864, n. 3 (N.D.Ala.1999); Brassfield v. Jack McLendon Furnitur......
  • Lloyd v. Whitworth
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 1 Noviembre 1993
    ...197 Ga.App. 226, 398 S.E.2d 253 (1990); Leach v. Aetna Cas., etc., Co., 172 Ga.App. 785, 324 S.E.2d 494 (1984), aff'd 254 Ga. 265, 330 S.E.2d 596 (1985). Because of our conclusion with respect to this enumeration, there is no need to address Lloyd's claim that the trial court erred in refus......
  • Rutledge v. Northbank Liquor Store, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 26 Septiembre 1985
    ...the merits, such a dismissal cannot be with prejudice. This holding has been affirmed by the Supreme Court. Aetna Cas., etc., Co. v. Leach, 254 Ga. 265, 330 S.E.2d 596 (1985). It follows that the trial court erred in granting appellees' motion for summary I am authorized to state that Judge......
  • Peachtree Winfrey Associates v. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 10 Octubre 1990
    ...that such a dismissal cannot be with prejudice." Leach v. Aetna Cas. etc., Co., 172 Ga.App. 785, 324 S.E.2d 494 (1984), aff'd 254 Ga. 265, 330 S.E.2d 596 (1985). We find appellee's argument that a dismissal with prejudice was proper because appellant failed to comply with an order of court ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT