Peachtree Winfrey Associates v. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors
Decision Date | 10 October 1990 |
Docket Number | No. A90A1297,A90A1297 |
Parties | PEACHTREE WINFREY ASSOCIATES v. GWINNETT COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
James W. McKenzie, Jr., for appellant.
Caryl B. Sumner, Richard A. Carothers, for appellee.
This appeal arises from the dismissal with prejudice of a civil action.
Appellant filed an appeal to the superior court from a decision of appellee, the Gwinnett County Board of Tax Assessors. Following discovery, the trial court published an order scheduling the pre-trial conference for "Friday, January 31, 1990." Reference to a 1990 calendar reveals that January 31, 1990, fell on Wednesday instead of Friday. When appellant did not appear at the pre-trial conference, the trial court, upon motion of the appellee, dismissed with prejudice appellant's action for want of prosecution.
In three enumerations of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in dismissing its action for want of prosecution. Appellant argues that the error in the scheduling order created confusion which resulted in its attorney's failure to appear at the pre-trial conference. "The authority of the trial court to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to appear at a pretrial hearing is clearly established by [OCGA § 9-11-41(b) ] and Weeks v. Weeks, 243 Ga. 416 (254 SE2d 366)." Turner v. T & T Oldsmobile, 154 Ga.App. 228(1), 267 S.E.2d 833 (1980). "An order of dismissal for failure to appear is discretionary with the trial court and is not subject to review by this court in the absence of an abuse of that discretion." Cohutta Mills v. Bunch, 166 Ga.App. 395(2), 304 S.E.2d 431 (1983). Furthermore, Id. Because appellant did not appear for the hearing and since there is no evidence in the record that appellant even inquired as to the dates specified in the order, we find no abuse of discretion in the dismissal of appellant's case.
OCGA § 9-11-41(b)(1) as amended in 1982 provides that "[a] dismissal for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute does not operate as an adjudication upon the merits." "Since a dismissal for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute does not operate as an adjudication upon the merits, it follows that such a dismissal cannot be with prejudice." Leach v. Aetna Cas. etc., Co., 172 Ga.App. 785, 324 S.E.2d 494 (1984), aff'd 254 Ga. 265, 330...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Denney v. Crenshaw
...See Atlanta Bus. Video v. FanTrace , 324 Ga. App. 559, 561-563, 751 S.E.2d 169 (2013) ; Peachtree Winfrey Assoc. v. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors , 197 Ga. App. 226, 226, 398 S.E.2d 253 (1990). These types of proceedings are distinguishable from oral argument on an opposing party's m......
-
Atlanta Bus. Video, LLC v. Fantrace, LLC
...counsel to appear at the trial court's April 2012 No Service/Default Calendar. 2.See also Peachtree Winfrey Assoc. v. Gwinnett Cty. Bd. of Tax Assessors, 197 Ga.App. 226, 226, 398 S.E.2d 253 (1990) (citing statute and supporting case law); Uniform Superior Court Rule 14 (providing that “[o]......
-
Lloyd v. Whitworth
...S.E.2d 778 (1991); see also Health Images v. Green, 207 Ga.App. 455, 428 S.E.2d 378 (1993); Peachtree Winfrey Assoc. v. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 197 Ga.App. 226, 398 S.E.2d 253 (1990); Leach v. Aetna Cas., etc., Co., 172 Ga.App. 785, 324 S.E.2d 494 (1984), aff'd 254 Ga. 265, 33......
-
All South Mini Storage No. 2, Ltd. v. Woodcon Const. Services, Inc.
...not subject to review by this court in the absence of an abuse of that discretion.' [Cit.]" Peachtree Winfrey Assoc. v. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 197 Ga.App. 226, 398 S.E.2d 253 (1990). However, a dismissal for failure to prosecute does not operate as an adjudication on the meri......