Aikens v. California 8212 5027
| Decision Date | 07 June 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 68,68 |
| Citation | 32 L.Ed.2d 511,92 S.Ct. 1931,406 U.S. 813 |
| Parties | Earnest James AIKENS, Jr., Petitioner, v. State of CALIFORNIA. —5027 |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Anthony G. Amsterdam, Stanford, Cal., for petitioner.
Ronald M. George, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Petitioner in this case, which has been orally argued and is now sub judice, has filed a Suggestion of Mootness and Motion for Remand based on the intervening decision of the California Supreme Court in People v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628, 100 Cal.Rptr. 152, 493 P.2d 880 (1972). That decision declared capital punishment in California unconstitutional under Art. 1, § 6, of the state constitution. The decision rested on an adequate state ground and the State's petition for writ of certiorari was denied. 406 U.S. 958, 92 S.Ct. 2060, 32 L.Ed.2d 344. The California Supreme Court declared in the Anderson case that its decision was fully retroactive and stated that any prisoner currently under sentence of death could petition a superior court to modify its judgment. Petitioner thus no longer faces a realistic threat of execution, and the issue on which certiorari was granted—the constitutionality of the death penalty under the Federal Constitution—is now moot in his case. Accordingly the writ of certiorari is dismissed.
Certiorari dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle
...A lack of concreteness seemed the motivation for a finding of mootness in North Carolina v. Rice, supra. See Aikens v. California, 406 U.S. 813, 92 S.Ct. 1931, 32 L.Ed.2d 511 (1972). Another group of cases includes those in which something other than the passage of time creates the mootness......
-
Graham v. Collins
...Texas, No. 69-5031. A fourth case, Aikens v. California, No. 68-5027, was argued with Furman but was dismissed as moot. 406 U.S. 813, 92 S.Ct. 1931, 32 L.Ed.2d 511 (1972). 2. Furman was surprised to discover the victim at home and, while trying to escape, accidentally tripped over a wire, c......
-
Furman v. Georgia Jackson v. Georgia Branch v. Texas 8212 5003, 69 8212 5030, 69 8212 5031
...Court, 70 Cal.2d 369, 74 Cal.Rptr. 882, 450 P.2d 258, held that capital punishment violates the State Constitution. 406 U.S. 813, 92 S.Ct. 1931, 32 L.Ed.2d 511. See People v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628, 100 Cal.Rptr. 152, 493 P.2d 88, cert. denied, 406 U.S. 958, 92 S.Ct. 2060, 32 L.Ed.2d 344 (1......
- U.S. v. Diggs
-
Pronouncements of the United States Supreme Court in the Criminal Law Field: 1976-1977 Term
...Court held that a California petitioner's challenge to the death penalty was moot in light of Anderson, supra. Aikens v. California, 406 U.S. 813(1972). [A note on the limits on the powers of state courts: eight months after the California court's decision in Anderson, it was overruled by a......