Alexander v. Phillips Oil Co., 85-28
Decision Date | 23 October 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 85-28,85-28 |
Citation | 707 P.2d 1385 |
Parties | 103 Lab.Cas. P 55,531, 1 IER Cases 1784 Ronald W. ALEXANDER, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. PHILLIPS OIL COMPANY, a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company, Appellee (Defendant), John Whitmire, Defendant. |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
H.W. Rasmussen and Clay B. Jenkins of Badley and Rasmussen, P.C., Sheridan, signed the brief on behalf of appellant; oral argument by Mr. Jenkins.
Kim D. Cannon of Burgess & Davis, Sheridan, signed the brief and appeared in oral argument on behalf of appellee.
Before THOMAS, C.J., and ROSE, ROONEY, BROWN and CARDINE, JJ.
This appeal is from a summary judgment entered against appellant in his action for wrongful termination of employment from his position of field supervisor over the Douglas Gathering System of appellee. Appellant words the issues on appeal:
We recently settled the issue relating to the at will doctrine in Rompf v. John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc., Wyo., 685 P.2d 25 (1984); Allen v. Safeway Stores, Inc., Wyo., 699 P.2d 277 (1985); Siebken v. Town of Wheatland, Wyo., 700 P.2d 1236 (1985); and Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. v. Parks, Wyo., 704 P.2d 702 (1985). We said in Siebken v. Town of Wheatland, supra, at page 1237:
* * * "
Accordingly, appellant's first issue requires no further discussion.
A summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c), W.R.C.P. A fact is material if proof of that fact would have the effect of establishing or refuting one of the essential elements of the cause of action. Johnson v. Soulis, Wyo., 542 P.2d 867 (1975). The burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue of a material fact is on the party moving for a summary judgment, and the record is reviewed by giving to the party opposing the motion all favorable inferences to be drawn from the facts contained in the material submitted in connection with the motion. Hyatt v. Big Horn School District No. 4, Wyo., 636 P.2d 525 (1981); Bancroft v. Jagusch, Wyo., 611 P.2d 819 (1980).
If appellant's employment was at will, he could have been discharged without cause. Allen v. Safeway Stores, Inc., supra; Mobil Coal Production, Inc. v. Parks, supra. A summary judgment would then be proper, the action being for "wrongful" discharge. In this case, appellee had issued a handbook which changed the status of appellant's employment. The trial court did not have the benefit of our opinion in Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. v. Parks, supra, wherein we said at page 704:
We then reviewed the provisions of the handbook and said at page 706:
In this case, two of appellee's publications which were before the court as exhibits in connection with the motion for summary judgment were a "YES" booklet 1 and portions of the "Disciplinary Procedures Manual for Supervisors." The YES handbook was distributed to all employees, and it treated most aspects of employer-employee relations, such as hours of work, promotions, transfers, vacations, holidays, leaves of absence, terminations, etc. It provided in pertinent part:
The portions of the Disciplinary Procedures Manual for Supervisors were distributed only to supervisors, including appellant. They provided in pertinent part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of Commerce
...from evidence other than the contract itself, and interpretation becomes a mixed question of law and fact.' " Alexander v. Phillips Oil Co., 707 P.2d 1385, 1387 (Wyo.1985) (quoting Mobil Coal Producing, Inc. v. Parks, 704 P.2d 702, 706 (Wyo.1985)). The contract of employment is created by e......
-
Gonsalves v. Nissan Motor in Hawaii
...are not subject to waiver or modification without the written consent of the chief executive officer"); Alexander v. Phillips Oil Co., 707 P.2d 1385, 1388-89 (Wyo.1985) (finding that "except for the recitation ... that termination can be `with or without cause,' the tenor of the ... handboo......
-
Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.
...and the practices of the industry in which the employee is engaged." Id. at 327, 171 Cal.Rptr. at 925-26; see, e.g., Alexander v. Phillips Oil Co., 707 P.2d 1385 (Wyo.1985). Some courts have refused to accept an implied-in-fact alteration of the at-will rule because it would eliminate mutua......
-
Abell v. Dewey
...added). Parks did not address any distinctions between permanent employment and probationary employment. In Alexander v. Phillips Oil Co., 707 P.2d 1385, 1389 (Wyo.1985), we held that an implied in fact contract of employment requiring cause for termination had been created when the employe......