Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. Alexander
Decision Date | 30 July 1951 |
Docket Number | No. 10258,10258 |
Citation | 136 W.Va. 521,66 S.E.2d 201 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | ALGOMA COAL & COKE CO. et al. v. ALEXANDER. |
Syllabus by the Court.
Code, 22-2, as amended, in the circumstances therein set out, requires that an operator of a coal mine employ a qualified person to serve as fire boss of the mine and a different person to serve as mine foreman therein and forbids a mine foreman, assistant mine foreman or section foreman to serve also as fire boss on the same day or shift in the same mine or section.
William C. Marland, Atty. Gen., Londo H. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Hillis Townsend, M. E. Boiarsky, Charleston, for C. E. Jones, amicus curiae.
Charles E. Mahan, Fayetteville, Rolla D. Campbell, Huntington, R. S. Spilman, Jr., R. G. Kelly, Frank R. Lyon, Jr., all of Charleston, for appellees.
This proceeding was instituted under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, now Code, 55-13-1, in the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, by the Algoma Coal and Coke Company and fifty-seven other coal mine operators, against Arch J. Alexander, individually, and as Chief of the Department of Mines of West Virginia. The object of the proceeding is to obtain a declaratory judgment as to whether the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 22 of the Code, as amended, prevent a mine foreman, assistant mine foreman or section foreman from acting as a fire boss during the same shift or day in the same mine or section. The appellant, Arch J. Alexander, individually and as Chief of the Department of Mines of West Virginia, demurred to the petition, the ground of the demurrer being that 'The statutes in the premises, and particularly Article 2, Chapter 22 of the Code of West Virginia, prohibit one who holds a fire boss certificate and who acts as a section foreman from acting in the capacity of fire boss during the same shift or day in the same mine or section.' The circuit court, on December 9, 1949, overruled the demurrer, held that 'Article 2 of Chapter 22 of the Code of West Virginia of 1931 as amended, does not forbid one who holds a fire boss certificate and who acts as a section foreman from fire bossing during the same shift or day in the same mine or section', and that 'The plaintiffs have a lawful right to employ persons who are duly and lawfully wualified as fire bosses and to have such persons perform duties as section foreman and perform duties as fire bosses during the same day or shift in the same mine or section * * *', and dismissed the petition. To review the action of the circuit court this Court, on February 6, 1950, granted this appeal.
The appellees allege in the petition for a declaratory judgment that they are corporations authorized to do business in West Virginia; that they are negaged in the business of producing bituminous coal; that the mines operated by them are subject to the Department of Mines of West Virginia and are required to be fire bossed; that each of the plaintiffs employs a mine foreman and a number of assistant mine foremen, sometimes called section foremen, and a fire boss; that each of such employees holds a 'certificate of competency for the position of mine foreman and for the position of fire boss issued to him by said Department of Mines'; that the section foremen act in supervisory capacities in directing production work and 'also perform duties of fire bosses in their respective sections'; that such employees perform all the duties required by Article 2 of Chapter 22 of the Code, as amended; that some of said employees perform duties as foremen and as fire bosses in the same mine and section during the same day or shift; that such method of fire bossing such mines is in conformity with the custom and practice existing for more than twenty years and that 'section foremen have been found to be better qualified and equipped than any other persons to fire boss mines'; that on January 17, 1949, the Chief of the Department of Mines issued a directive to all administrative assistants of the department to the effect that thereafter 'No mine foreman, section foreman, or assistant foreman, acting as such, can legally fire boss a mine', and that such directive and the orders issued thereunder 'are unlawful and without warrant of authority by statute or otherwise * * *'. Other allegations of fact will be referred to later in this opinion.
The defendant would justify the issuance of the directive by an interpretation of the statutes relating to the employment by the operator of a fire boss and mine foreman and upon an opinion of the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia. Various sections of Article 2, Chapter 22 of the Code, as amended, relate to the employment of a fire boss by the operator and the duties of such fire boss. Sections 42 and 43 read:
experience in mines liberating explosive gases.
Section 44 requires that 'The fire boss shall, upon having completed the examination of the mine before each shift, make a written record of the condition of the mine within a book', provided for that purpose, and that the book shall at all times be kept at the mine subject to inspection by the district mine inspector or Chief of the Department of Mines. Section 45 provides that 'In the performance of the duties devolving upon the fire bosses they shall have no superior officers, but all the employees working inside of such mine or mines shall be subordinate to them in their particular work.' Section 46 makes it a misdemeanor for 'any person to enter' a mine at the beginning of any shift until the signal required by Section 43 'has been given by the fire boss', except 'under the direction of the fire boss', and then only for the purpose of 'making the mine safe'. Section 54 requires that 'All places in live sections that are temporarily abandoned shall be examined as live workings by the fire boss on regular inspections'. Section 16 requires that all mine foremen and fire bosses 'employed in gaseous mines shall, at all times, carry an appoved flame safety lamp for the purpose of detecting the presence of explosive gas, such lamp to be kept lighted at all times when in use inside the mines.' Other sections relating to fire bosses are, we believe, not material to the decision herein.
Various sections of Article 2 relate to the appointment by the operator of mine foremen and their duties. Sections 47 and 48 read:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Board of Ed. of Wyoming County v. Board of Public Works
...statutory provision on which such directive is based may be determined in a declaratory judgment proceeding. Algoma Coal and Coke Company v. Alexander, 136 W.Va. 521, 66 S.E.2d 201. Other cases in which this Court has recognized the existence of a justiciable controversy in a declaratory ju......
-
State ex rel. Schroath v. Condry
...149 S.E. 669; Hays v. Harris, 73 W.Va. 17, 80 S.E. 827. See State v. Epperly, 135 W.Va. 877, 65 S.E.2d 488; Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. Alexander, 136 W.Va. 521, 66 S.E.2d 201. Reading, considering and giving full effect to the foregoing statutes, the ultimate effect is to place the holder of......
-
Brouzas v. City of Morgantown
...S.E.2d 923; Douglass v. Koontz, 137 W.Va. 345, 71 S.E.2d 319; Conley v. Easley, 136 W.Va. 645, 68 S.E.2d 23; Algoma Coal and Coke Company v. Alexander, 136 W.Va. 521, 66 S.E.2d 201; Tharp v. Tharp, 131 W.Va. 529, 48 S.E.2d 793; Dolan v. Hardman, 126 W.Va. 480, 29 S.E.2d 8. The relief availa......
-
State ex rel. Perry v. Miller
...of mine foremen, assistant mine foremen and fire bosses. Under a similar statute, this Court held in Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. Alexander, 136 W.Va. 521, 529, 66 S.E.2d 201, 205 (1950):"Mine foremen, assistant mine foremen and fire bosses are statutory officers and in the performance of thei......