Allen v. National Life & Acc. Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 29 January 1934 |
Parties | LIZZIE ALLEN, RESPONDENT, v. THE NATIONAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., APPELLANT |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Jackson County.--Hon. Ralph S. Latshaw Judge.
Reversed and remanded.
G. W Duvall, V. H. Monteil and W. W. Filkin for respondent.
McAllister Humphrey, Pew & Broaddus for appellant.
This is an action upon two policies of insurance. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $ 2,418. Defendant has appealed.
One of the policies provided for the payment to plaintiff of weekly benefits in the sum of $ 5 per week for a period of twenty-six weeks in each year, in the event that plaintiff became totally disabled. The other provided for the payment of $ 1 per week during the same period under like conditions.
Plaintiff alleged in her petition that she became totally disabled on October 29, 1927, and that she would continue to be so disabled during the remainder of her life. She asked judgment for the sum of $ 156 claimed to be due her at the time of the filing of the petition. She further alleged that in October, 1929, defendant repudiated the contract and that she had an expectancy of life running 28.18 years; that she was entitled to recover, in addition to the sum of $ 156 due, the sum of $ 4,396.08, being the amount of the indemnity to accrue during her expectancy of life.
The evidence shows that plaintiff was totally disabled as a result of an elevator accident. It was admitted that all premiums were duly paid and plaintiff alleged in her petition that she had performed all of her duties under the policies. Defendant paid the benefits as they accrued for a period of six months after the accident, at which time it refused to make any further payments.
In support of her case and over the objection of defendant, plaintiff introduced an actuary and through him the American Insurance Tables of Mortality. The witness testified that these tables were based upon the expectancy of life of persons in good health and that the expectancy of a person of the age of plaintiff was 23.08 years. Defendant throughout the trial objected to any testimony relative to plaintiff's condition after the institution of her suit.
Defendant insists that the court erred in refusing its Instructions One, Two and Three, in which instructions it was sought to limit the right of plaintiff's recovery for weekly benefits that were due when her suit was filed.
It will thus be seen that this appeal involves the question as to whether the holder of a contract of insurance providing for periodic payments of benefits for disability is entitled to a commutation of such benefits which might become due in the future, on the ground that the insurance company has been guilty of an anticipatory breach of the contract, the determination of the future benefits being based on the life expectancy of the insured. The solution of the question presented depends upon a proper application of the rule announced in the leading case of Roehm v. Horst, 178 U.S. 1, 44 L.Ed. 953, 20 S.Ct. 780, which case has been followed in this State. [See Leon v. Barnsdall Zinc Co., 309 Mo. 276, 290, 274 S.W. 699.] In those cases the rule is laid down that where the contract is mutually executory, at least in part, and there are interdependent covenants to be simultaneously performed, a repudiation or renunciation of the contract, on the part of one, covering the entire performance, before the time of performance, is such a breach as gives immediate right of action for the entire damages arising as a result of the breach; but where one party has completely executed his part of the contract and it is executory on the part of the other party only, or where the contract is unilateral or it is bilateral but contains an independent promise, such as a contract with respect to the payment of money at specified times, in case of repudiation a suit may be maintained only for each installment as it becomes due, or, if action is not brought until more than one installment is due, then all that are due may be sued for in one action. [See, also, State ex rel. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 228 S.W. 865, 867.]
The question, therefore, is whether the indemnity contracted for in the policies of insurance before us come under the heading of mutually executory contracts or whether the contracts have been executed by one party. We think that these contracts of insurance come under the latter. Plaintiff has fully performed her part of the contracts and there remains nothing to be done except for defendant to pay the installments at the times specified.
The objection to permitting recovery on the life expectancy of the insured on the theory that plaintiff became totally disabled is well stated in the case of Howard v. Benefit Ass'n of Ry. Employees, supra, l. c. 658:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pack v. Progressive Life Ins. Co.
...v. Liberty Nat. L. Ins. Co., 231 Mo.App. 239, 101 S.W.2d 109; Liederman v. Independent Order, 173 S.W.2d 848; Allen v. Nat. L. & Acc. Ins. Co., 228 Mo.App. 450, 67 S.W.2d 534; Leon et al. v. Barnsdall Zinc Co., 309 Mo. 276, S.W. 699; Jose v. Aufderheide, 293 S.W. 476; Puckett v. Nat. Mut. A......
-
Umbenhower v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, Civ. A. No. 16789-3.
...to disability contracts of this nature. Bonslett v. New York Life Ins. Co. (Mo.Sup.) 190 S.W. 870; Allen v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co., 228 Mo.App. 450, 67 S.W.2d 534; Merrick v. Allstate Ins. Co. (C.A. 8) 349 F.2d 279, cert. den. 382 U.S. 957, 86 S.Ct. 435, 15 L.Ed.2d 361; Hawkinson......
-
Smith ex rel. Stephan v. Af & L Ins. Co.
...The issue of prospective payments in insurance breach of contract cases is rarely addressed in our case law. In Allen v. National Life & Accident Insurance Company, the insured alleged that she was permanently disabled. 228 Mo.App. 450, 67 S.W.2d 534, 534 (1934). Her policy specified that s......
-
Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Reeves
...... . . In. Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. Walker, 128 Okl. 75,. 260 P. 1109, it is held: "Where a ... accruing benefits.". . . In. Allen v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co., 228. Mo.App. 450, 67 S.W.2d ......