Altstatt v. Florida Dept. of Agriculture, 1D08-3329.
Decision Date | 19 February 2009 |
Docket Number | No. 1D08-3329.,1D08-3329. |
Citation | 1 So.3d 1285 |
Parties | Larry ALTSTATT, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, and Florida Department of Insurance, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Alex Lancaster of Lancaster & Eure, Sarasota, for Appellant.
Cindy R. Galen of Eraclides, Johns, Hall, Gelman, Johannessen & Goodman, L.L.P., Sarasota, for Appellees.
In this workers' compensation case, claimant seeks review of an order denying his "Motion to Approve Defense Attorney Fees" by which he sought to require the attorney for the employer and servicing agent to seek approval by the judge of compensation claims of any requests for attorney's fees made by the attorney to her clients. It is, however, clear that section 440.105(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2008), upon which claimant relied as authority for his motion does not require approval of any attorney's fee by the judge of compensation claims; rather, it merely makes it unlawful to receive a fee unless that fee has been approved. Because nothing in section 440.105(3)(c) ( ) required the judge of compensation claims to take the action requested by claimant in his motion, the order denying that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jacobson v. Se. Pers. Leasing, Inc.
...application only to attorneys representing claimants, it has long been interpreted as such in practice. See Altstatt v. Fla. Dep't of Agric., 1 So.3d 1285, 1286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“We find it unnecessary to decide whether the legislature intended section 440.105(3)(c) to apply to requests......
-
Douglas v. State, 1D08-4143.
... ... Lavoris DOUGLAS, Petitioner, ... STATE of Florida, Respondent ... No. 1D08-4143 ... District Court of ... ...