Am. Bus. USA Corp. v. Dep't of Revenue, 4D13–1472.
| Decision Date | 27 July 2016 |
| Docket Number | No. 4D13–1472.,4D13–1472. |
| Citation | 195 So.3d 430 (Mem) |
| Parties | AMERICAN BUSINESS USA CORP., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Michael D. Sloan, David B. Esau, and Dean A. Morande of Carlton Fields, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Carrol Y. Cherry Eaton, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey M. Dikman, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Angela L. Huston, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
On Remand From The Supreme Court Of Florida
This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida.
In American Business USA Corp. v. Department of Revenue, 151 So.3d 67 (Fla.2014), we reversed the Florida Department of Revenue's order imposing a tax assessment for the sale of flowers to out-of-state customers for out-of-state delivery.
Florida Department of Revenue v. American Business USA Corp., 191 So.3d 906 , the Supreme Court of Florida quashed our decision.
Based on the Supreme Court of Florida's decision, we now affirm the Florida Department of Revenue's order imposing a tax assessment for the sale of flowers to out-of-state customers for out-of-state delivery.
We maintain our affirmance of that part of the order regarding the imposition of a tax assessment on the sales of prepaid calling arrangements. 151 So.3d at 68–69. That affirmance was not the subject of our supreme court's decision.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Adams v. State
...that the error was harmless because the evidence against the defendant was overwhelming. However, the harmless error test “is not a 195 So.3d 430 sufficiency-of-the-evidence, a correct result, a not clearly wrong, a substantial evidence, a more probable than not, a clear and convincing, or ......