American Bankers Life Assur. Co. of Fla. v. Williams, K--70

Decision Date23 July 1968
Docket NumberNo. K--70,K--70
Citation212 So.2d 777
PartiesAMERICAN BANKERS LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Broward WILLIAMS, As State Treasurer and Insurance Commissioner, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf, Miami, for petitioner.

Thomas E. Boyle and Stephen Marc Slepin, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Robert E. Gibson, Insurance Counsel, for respondent.

RAWLS, Judge.

American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida, a domestic life insurance company, filed its petition for writ of certiorari to review a final order of the Insurance Commissioner construing the phrase 'taken by' when used in Section 624.0227, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., as having the effect of requiring an application for a life insurance policy to be either signed in the presence of the agent or submitted to him for scrutiny in the applicant's presence before being forwarded to the company for acceptance or rejection.

The construction of the above-mentioned statute is the only issue before this court.

Section 624.0227, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., reads as follows:

'(1) No life insurer shall deliver or issue for delivery in this state any policy of life insurance, * * * unless the application for such policy or contract is Taken by, and the delivery of such policy or contract is made through, an insurance agent of the insurer duly licensed under the law of Florida, who shall receive the usual commission due to an agent from such insurer.

'(2) Each such insurer shall maintain a licensed insurance agent at all times for the purpose of and through whom policies or contracts issued or delivered in this state, shall be serviced.

'(3) This section shall not apply to policies of insurance or annuity contracts on nonresidents which are applied for outside of and delivered in the state.' (Emphasis supplied.)

The petitioner contends that the intent of the statute is to assure that all applications will pass through a licensed Florida agent and to prevent mail-order insurance written by nonadmitted insurers having no agents in Florida, but it does not require the physical presence of an agent at the time the application is completed. We agree.

In construing the above statute we are compelled to use the same rules as govern this court in construing any and all statutes. Words of common usage should be construed in their plain and ordinary sense. 1 The word 'take' is a very general term with many definitions and without any very specific connotation. Among the most common meanings are: 'to get into one's hands or into one's possession, power or control by force or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
102 cases
  • Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 23, 2013
    ...and obvious implications. To do so would be an abrogation of legislative power.’ ”) (quoting Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Fla. v. Williams, 212 So.2d 777, 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) (emphasis added)); State v. Egan, 287 So.2d 1, 7 (Fla.1973) (recognizing that “[u]nder our constitutional s......
  • R.C. v. Dep't of Agric. & Consumer Servs.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 16, 2021
    ...a statute in a way that would inject requirements the Legislature had not previously adopted. See Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Fla. v. Williams , 212 So. 2d 777, 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) ("This court is without power to construe an unambiguous statute in a way which would extend, modify......
  • Schoeff v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., SC15–2233
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 14, 2017
    ...to] do so would be an abrogation of legislative power." Id. at 219 (emphasis omitted) (quoting Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Fla. v. Williams, 212 So.2d 777, 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968) ).Unfortunately, despite this Court's cogent explanation of a "textualist" approach to statutory construc......
  • Knowles v. Beverly Enterprises-Florida
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 16, 2004
    ...its express terms or its reasonable and obvious implications." Holly, 450 So.2d at 219 (quoting Am. Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Fla. v. Williams, 212 So.2d 777, 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)). Thus, while petitioner is correct that section 400.023(1) should be liberally construed, such construc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT