American United Life Insurance Co. v. Goodman
Decision Date | 06 January 1941 |
Docket Number | 4-6116 |
Citation | 146 S.W.2d 907,201 Ark. 634 |
Parties | AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. GOODMAN, GUARDIAN |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Lee Circuit Court; E. M. Pipkin, Judge; affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Daggett & Daggett, for appellant.
Mann & McCulloch and Burke & Burke, for appellee.
March 2, 1923, American Central Life Insurance Company issued to Elizabeth Taylor Sellers two policies of life insurance identical in terms for the principal sum of $ 2,500 under each policy. Appellant, American United Life Insurance Company, is the successor in interest of the original insurer.
These policies contained a provision by which, for the consideration of $ 7.43 included in the annual premium of $ 126.48, appellant agreed to pay disability benefits of $ 25 per month to the insured in the event of permanent and total disability as provided in the policy.
September 2, 1938, appellee filed suit in the Lee circuit court on each of these policies, seeking to recover on behalf of her ward Elizabeth Taylor Sellers, under the total and permanent disability clause in each of the policies. The sum of $ 2,348.18, together with 12 per cent. damages and attorneys' fees, was sought in each case.
September 19, 1938, each of these causes was removed to the district court of the United States. Upon proper motions, they were remanded to the state court.
October 9, 1939, the trial court consolidated the two causes of action for the purpose of trial.
December 27, 1939, a petition for the removal of the consolidated causes to the district court of the United States was filed. The grounds being (1) diversity of citizenship; and (2) amount in controversy being in excess of $ 3,000: to-wit $ 4,696.36. January 3, 1940, this petition for removal was denied by the court.
January 3, 1940, the consolidated causes proceeded to trial. There was a verdict for the plaintiff in each case in the sum of $ 2,102.68. In addition to the verdict, the jury returned into open court answers to two interrogatories submitted by the defendant, as follows:
Judgment was accordingly entered by the court in each case, together with 12 per cent. damages thereon, and an attorneys' fee of $ 250 to be taxed as costs. Thereafter appellant filed motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and this appeal followed.
Appellant assigns here four alleged errors as follows:
We proceed first to discuss appellant's assignment No. 4. We think no error was committed by the trial court in denying appellant's petition for removal filed December 27, 1939, following consolidation of the two causes. Section 1289 of Pope's Digest applies here. That section is as follows:
It must be conceded that the two causes, which were consolidated for trial in the instant case, are "of a like nature or relative to the same question." The two contracts of insurance were identical in terms; the same parties were involved. Throughout the pleadings and trial, the identity of the separate causes based upon the two policies of insurance was maintained. The complaints, the answers, verdicts, judgments, etc., were separate. Clearly, we think the court properly consolidated the two causes for trial to avoid unnecessary costs and delay and no abuse of discretion is shown. The effect of consolidation in the instant case was to make the two consolidated suits one action on two causes of action and identity of the separate causes of action was maintained throughout the trial.
In St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Oxford, 174 Ark. 966, 298 S.W. 207, in considering the consolidation of four separate suits for trial, this court said:
This identical question seems to have been definitely determined against appellant's contention in New York Life Ins. Co. v. Farrell, 187 Ark. 984, 63 S.W.2d 520. There it was said: After considering several cases cited by appellant, this additional language appears in the opinion: "There is nothing in any of the cases relied upon by appellant that would justify or authorize a removal to the Federal Court."
We now pass to appellant's assignment No. 2 on the question of total and permanent disability.
The record reflects that at the time of the issuance of the policies in question, Mrs. Sellers was a saleslady, she followed this occupation until 1928 when she engaged in business for herself. In 1932 she became so afflicted with arthritis, disease of the gall bladder and other ailments that she was forced to give up entirely the business in which she was engaged and on account of her afflictions she has been confined almost continuously to her home up to the time of trial.
That part of the insurance contract pertinent here is as follows:
No proof of any claim for disability benefits under the policies was made to appellant company by Mrs. Sellers until in 1938.
A number of witnesses on behalf of appellee, including Mrs. Sellers' daughter, Mrs. Goodman, Dr. H. D. Bogart, her family physician for 20 years, Bessie Harrington, Elizabeth Harrington, Virginia Sutton, and Mary Spaine, gave testimony which tended strongly to show that Mrs. Sellers was totally and permanently disabled, within the meaning of that provision of the policy quoted above, from January, 1932, until the time of the trial.
We think it would...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schoen v. American Nat. Ins. Co.
... ... G. Schoen, Appellant, v. American National Insurance" Company No 38488 Supreme Court of Missouri April 3, 1944 ... \xC2" ... of disability. Hablutzel v. Home Life Ins. Co., 332 ... Mo. 920, 59 S.W.2d 639, affirmed 52 S.W.2d 480; ... 336; Bean v. Ins ... Co., 190 A. 131, 88 N.H. 416; American United Life ... Ins. Co. v. Goodman, 146 S.W.2d 907, 201 Ark. 634; ... Pan ... ...