Anderson's Estate

Decision Date28 February 1921
Docket Number358,207
Citation269 Pa. 535,112 A. 766
PartiesAnderson's Estate
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Argued February 8, 1921

Appeal, Nos. 207 and 358, Jan. T., 1921, by E.M. Anderson et al., from decree of O.C. Chester Co., No. 8448, appointing trustee in estate of Joseph Anderson, deceased. Affirmed.

Petition for appointment of trustee. Before HAUSE, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

The court entered a decree appointing a trustee.

Geo. F Anderson and Harry I. Anderson, next of kin and administrators d.b.n.c.t.a., and Eber M. Anderson, next of kin, appealed.

Error assigned was above decree, quoting it.

The decree of the court below is affirmed and the appeals are dismissed at the costs of the respective appellants.

John J Sullivan and George B. Johnson, with them George S. Dewees, for appellants, cited as to powers of the administrators d.b.n.c.t.a.: Evans v. Chew, 71 Pa. 47; Sheets's Est., 215 Pa. 164; Sears v. Scranton Trust Co., 228 Pa. 126.

Where a trustee has, under the instrument creating the trust, the alternative of applying the fund to a charitable purpose or to a purpose which is not regarded as charitable within the technical meaning of that term, the trust will not be enforced: 5 Ruling Case Law, p. 341, par. 72; Hadley v. Forsee, 14 L.R.A. (N.S.) 90.

Harris L. Sproat, for appellee. -- Testator having created a trust for charity, then, although he expressly conferred upon his "executors or the survivor of them" the power to distribute for such purpose "as in their judgment may seem best," nevertheless, upon the death of the executors leaving undistributed trust assets, jurisdiction to fill the vacancy in the trusteeship is conferred upon the court by the Act of 1895: De Silver's Est., 211 Pa. 459; Dulles's Est., 218 Pa. 162; Toner's Est., 260 Pa. 49.

Where a bequest is indelibly stamped with a trust, the property will not revert to the heirs of the grantor, even though the trustee fail or the object of the trust ceases to exist: Cowan's Est., 16 Pa. C.C.R. 518; Tenth Presbyterian Church, 8 Pa. Dist. R. 323; Com. v. Connellsburg Boro., 25 Pa. C.C.R. 433.

Before MOSCHZISKER, C.J., FRAZER, SIMPSON, SADLER and SCHAFFER, JJ.

OPINION

MR. JUSTICE SIMPSON:

With the consent of the attorney general, a petition was filed in the court below, under the Act of May 23, 1895, P.L. 114, averring that testator had owned a property in West Chester, Pennsylvania, which became part of his residuary estate; that his executors had all died leaving it unsold, though testator had authorized them to sell it, and as to the proceeds had provided as follows: "I direct my said executors or the survivor of them to distribute said residue among such institutions or do such acts of charity therewith as in their judgment may seem best"; and prayed the appointment of a trustee to sell the property and distribute its proceeds as provided by the will. The heirs at law objected: (1st) Because the above quoted clause was void; and (2d) Because, if valid, the powers given to the executors enure to the administrators d.b.n.c.t.a. The court below overruled the objections, appointed a trustee, and these two appeals followed.

The first objection is founded on the claim that, under the clause above quoted, the executors had power to make distribution among "institutions" which are not charitable in their nature; that doing "acts of charity" are not necessarily making charitable gifts within the meaning of the statute; and hence since it was possible, in either event, for the executors to have appropriated the proceeds to other than "religious, charitable, literary or scientific" uses, the gift was void under the principle that where power is given to distribute to other than such uses, the trust will not be enforced: 5 Ruling Case Law 341. It may be conceded this principle is correctly stated, but it is inapplicable here, since we agree with the court below...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • In re Estate
    • United States
    • Vermont Supreme Court
    • 11 Octubre 1922
  • Falk v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10380.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 5 Junio 1951
    ... ... the trust until his death, Leon Falk, as empowered by the deed of trust, directed his brother as trustee to pay from the income of the trust estate a total of $23,250 to certain charitable, benevolent and educational institutions. Those monies were duly paid. From the date of the death of his ... ...
  • Westport Bank & Trust Co. v. Fable
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 13 Junio 1940
    ...Kirwin v. Attorney General, 275 Mass. 34, 40, 175 N.E. 164; King v. Rockwell, 93 N.J.Eq. 46, 48, 115 A. 40; In re Anderson's Estate, 269 Pa. 535, 112 A. 766; In re Planck's Estate, 150 Wash. 301, 306, 272 P. 972; Selleck v. Thompson, 28 R.I. 350, 67 A. 425; 2 Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, op......
  • In re Baughman's Estate
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 8 Julio 1924
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT