Anderson v. State
Decision Date | 28 March 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 00-289.,00-289. |
Citation | 2002 WY 46,43 P.3d 108 |
Parties | Elly ANDERSON, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Kenneth M. Koski, State Public Defender, and Donna D. Domonkos, Appellate Counsel, Representing Appellant.
Hoke MacMillan, Attorney General; Paul S. Rehurek, Deputy Attorney General; D. Michael Pauling and Kimberly A. Baker, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Representing Appellee.
Before LEHMAN, C.J., and GOLDEN, HILL, KITE, and VOIGT, JJ.
[¶ 1] Appellant, Elly Anderson (Anderson), challenges an order of the district court revoking probation granted to her under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-301 (Lexis-Nexis 2001).1 Anderson contends that the district court did not have a sufficient factual basis for revoking her probation, and that it failed to establish a factual basis for her guilty plea before accepting that plea. We will reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
[¶ 2] Anderson states these issues:
The State styles the issues thus:
[¶ 3] Anderson entered a plea of guilty to a charge that, during the early morning hours of October 3, 1996, she committed the crime of aggravated assault and battery upon the person of James Hall (Hall). That crime is defined by statute:
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-502 (LexisNexis 2001) (emphasis added).
[¶ 4] Anderson was charged in two counts, count one being the charge of aggravated assault and battery and count two being a charge of simple assault. The simple assault statute provides:
Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-501 (LexisNexis 2001).
[¶ 5] Hall and Anderson lived together and had a child who was about 21 months old. During an episode of domestic violence, Anderson held a kitchen knife up in front of herself and threatened to use it on Hall. Anderson entered a plea of not guilty on November 21, 1996. On February 24, 1997, Anderson appeared in district court to change her plea in connection with a plea agreement. The agreement was that Anderson would consent to plead guilty to aggravated assault, and in exchange the State would dismiss the simple assault charge and recommend that she be sentenced under Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-13-301, so long as the presentence report established that she had no prior felonies, assaults or batteries. During the course of the plea proceeding,2 the district court asked Anderson if she suffered from a mental illness, and she answered, "No." Anderson was asked to provide a factual basis for her plea, and the transcript reflects this:
[¶ 7] At the sentencing proceeding3 Anderson's attorney made an objection to the "tenor" of the report and stated to the district court that if the probation agent had followed up on Anderson's reports, then much of the information could have been verified. The district court noted the objection but then asked what the sentencing recommendation was. The discussion that followed focused in significant part on Anderson's "instability," the fact that she was currently under the care of a psychiatrist and taking medications, and that Anderson had not been truthful with the probation agent during the presentence investigation process. All in all, based upon the probation agent's perception of Anderson, which perception now had been methodically communicated to the district court, this was not an altogether promising beginning to a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. State
...a sound judgment exercised with regard to what is right under the circumstances and without doing so arbitrarily or capriciously. Anderson v. State, 2002 WY 46, ¶ 25, 43 P.3d 108, ¶ 25 (Wyo.2002) (citing Vaughn v. State, 962 P.2d 149, 151 (Wyo.1998)); also see State v. 183 Wis.2d 297, 515 N......
- Lancaster v. State, 00-235.
-
Van Haele v. State
...a plea may be inferred from circumstances surrounding the crime and need not be established only from the defendant's statements. Anderson v. State, 2002 WY 46, ¶ 32, 43 P.3d 108, ¶ 32 (Wyo.2002) (citing Barnes v. State, 951 P.2d 386, 388-89 (Wyo.1998); Rude v. State, 851 P.2d at 17-18). Ru......
-
Csc v. State, C-04-12.
...which the defendant is pleading guilty." Id. (citing Rude v. State, 851 P.2d 15, 18 (Wyo.1993)). See also, Van Haele, ¶¶ 13, 26; Anderson v. State, 2002 WY 46, ¶ 32, 43 P.3d 108, 120 [¶ 12] CSC pled guilty to aiding and abetting in the commission of first-degree sexual assault, in violation......