Andrews v. Wilbanks, S95A0559
| Decision Date | 30 June 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. S95A0559,S95A0559 |
| Citation | 265 Ga. 555,458 S.E.2d 817 |
| Parties | ANDREWS et al. v. WILBANKS. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
John H. Fleming, Bruce A. Denning, Thomas W. Curvin, Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Atlanta, for Andrews.
Gerald Davidson, Jr., Jonathan D. Crumly, Andersen, Davidson & Tate, P.C., Lawrenceville, for Wilbanks.
Dorothy Thompson Bagwell died in 1993 after executing a will in 1986 by which she bequeathed one-half of her estate to be divided among two greatnieces and a greatnephew (the Andrewses), with the remaining half of her estate bequeathed to appellee W.P. Wilbanks, an attorney who had been appointed guardian of the testatrix's person and property in August 1983. When the 1986 will was offered for probate in solemn form, appellants filed a caveat alleging that the testatrix lacked testamentary capacity and that the will was the product of undue influence. Appellants asserted that Wilbanks, while in a fiduciary relationship with the testatrix as her guardian, engaged in a pattern of deception by appearing to visit the testatrix frequently out of kindness and to tend to her wants and needs while, unbeknownst to the testatrix, he was charging her estate as guardian for the time spent visiting her and tending to her needs. In order to show at trial that this purported pattern of deception resulted in appellee's exertion of undue influence over the testatrix, appellants filed a motion in limine asking the probate court to permit evidence showing the amount of compensation Wilbanks had received as the testatrix's guardian, the basis for that compensation, and that the testatrix was not aware of the basis or the amount of the fees paid to Wilbanks. The probate court authorized the admission of evidence that Wilbanks had received compensation for his services as guardian, but ruled inadmissible evidence regarding the amounts Wilbanks received, the basis for determining the fees received, as well as evidence tending to show that the testatrix was not aware of the amount or basis for determining her guardian's compensation. We granted appellants' application for interlocutory review.
A motion in limine is a pretrial method of determining the admissibility of evidence, as a party may secure a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of evidence or a ruling prohibiting any reference to certain evidence until its admissibility can be assessed in the context of the trial as it unfolds. State v. Johnston, 249 Ga....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pneumo Abex, LLC v. Long
...reference to certain evidence until its admissibility can be assessed in the context of the trial as it unfolds." Andrews v. Wilbanks , 265 Ga. 555, 556, 458 S.E.2d 817 (1995) ; accord Dep't of Transp. v. Wallace Enters., 2 34 Ga. App. 1, 5 (6), 505 S.E.2d 549 (1998) ; see Miller v. Lynch ,......
-
Hand v. Pettitt
...in limine excluding evidence is a judicial power which must be exercised with great care." (Citation omitted.) Andrews v. Wilbanks, 265 Ga. 555, 556, 458 S.E.2d 817 (1995). A motion in limine is a pretrial motion which may be used in two ways: 1) The movant seeks, not a final ruling on the ......
-
EZ Green Assocs., LLC v. Ga.-Pac. Corp.
...and as such, we will review the trial court's order under the standard of review applicable to such motions. See Andrews v. Wilbanks, 265 Ga. 555, 556, 458 S.E.2d 817 (1995) (noting that “[a] motion in limine is a pretrial method of determining the admissibility of evidence”); Collins v. Mi......
-
AgSouth Farm Credit v. Gowen Timber Co.
...the evidence at issue could be admissible at trial." One Bluff Drive, 330 Ga.App. at 51(3), 766 S.E.2d 508, citing Andrews v. Wilbanks, 265 Ga. 555, 556, 458 S.E.2d 817 (1995). (a) AgSouth brought this timber conversion action against Gowen Timber pursuant to OCGA § 51–12–51, which provides......
-
Wills, Trusts, and Administration of Estates - James C. Rehberg
...466 S.E.2d 581 (1996). 49. Id. at 231-32, 466 S.E.2d at 582-83. 50. Id. at 232, 466 S.E.2d at 583. 51. Id. at 234, 466 S.E.2d at 584. 52. 265 Ga. 555, 458 S.E.2d 817 (1995). 53. Id. at 556, 458 S.E.2d at 818. 54. Id. 55. Id. 56. Id. 57. 217 Ga. App. 546, 458 S.E.2d 175 (1995). 58. Id. at 54......