Anglin v. Anglin
Decision Date | 09 June 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 18205,18205 |
Citation | 76 S.E.2d 498,209 Ga. 823 |
Parties | ANGLIN v. ANGLIN. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Barrett & Hayes and Otis C. Bell, Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.
O. C. Hancock, D. W. Rolader and Robt. C. Dell, Jr., Atlanta, for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
1. Where, as in this case, the petition for divorce based upon the grounds of cruel treatment contained the following allegations: --it was not error to overrule the general demurrer to the petition. See Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 159 Ga. 332, 125 S.E. 856; Pierce v. Pierce, 145 Ga. 886, 89 S.E. 1045; and Miller v. Miller, 139 Ga. 282, 77 S.E. 21.
2. The assignments of error based upon the rulings on the special demurrer not having been argued in this court, will be treated as abandoned.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except ATKINSON, P. J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Homer Lumber Co.
...of error based upon rulings on special demurrer, not having been argued in this court, will be treated as abandoned. Anglin v. Anglin, 209 Ga. 823(2), 76 S.E.2d 498. 5. Applying the above principles to the pleadings in the present case, the trial court did not err in overruling the demurrer......
-
Hardy v. Hardy
...constant nagging and false accusations can amount to cruel treatment. Hirsch v. Hirsch, 217 Ga. 590(1), 123 S.E.2d 915; Anglin v. Anglin, 209 Ga. 823(1), 76 S.E.2d 498; Wilkinson v. Wilkinson, 159 Ga. 332(2), 125 S.E. 856; Miller v. Miller, 139 Ga. 282(1), 77 S.E. 21. Following the rule sta......
-
Teasley v. Jones, 20467
...of demurrer to various paragraphs of the petition, not having been argued in this court, will be treated as abandoned. Anglin v. Anglin, 209 Ga. 823(2), 76 S.E.2d 498; Davis v. Homer Lumber Co., 211 Ga. 144 (4), 84 S.E.2d Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. ...
-
Whiteway Neon-Ad. v. Maddox
...in this court, will be treated as abandoned. See in this connection, Roseman v. Wright, 209 Ga. 748(1), 76 S.E.2d 7; Anglin v. Anglin, 209 Ga. 823(2), 76 S.E.2d 498. Applying the above stated legal principles to the pleadings under consideration, the trial court did not err in sustaining th......