Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.
| Decision Date | 23 August 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 04CA1528.,04CA1528. |
| Citation | 183 P.3d 582 |
| Parties | Carol ANTOLOVICH, Richard Antolovich, Carolyn Thompson, John Thompson, Frederick Hall, Susan Jane Lee, and Heidi Groomer, individually and as class representatives, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. BROWN GROUP RETAIL, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, and Redfield Rifle Scopes, Inc., an Iowa corporation, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
-
Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.
...evidence was proper both because Qwest opened the door, and because the evidence showed Qwest's intent. See Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc., 183 P.3d 582, 598 (Colo.App.2007) (improperly admitted evidence that is cumulative to admissible evidence is harmless). However, I note that th......
-
Board of County Com'Rs v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.
...prevent activities and conditions on their land from creating an unreasonable risk of harm to others."); Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc., 183 P.3d 582, 594 (Colo.Ct.App.2007). C. Negligence per Brown Group argues Plaintiff's negligence per se claim should be dismissed because it is p......
-
Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.
...court's decision not to admit expert testimony for an abuse of discretion. See Rector, 248 P.3d at 1200;Antolovich v. Brown Grp. Retail, Inc., 183 P.3d 582, 596 (Colo.App.2007). We will not disturb the decision unless it is manifestly erroneous or based on an incorrect legal standard. See E......
-
Haralampopoulos v. Kelly
...procedure. Because Harte's later testimony was cumulative of Radetsky's, it did not prejudice guardian. See Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.,183 P.3d 582, 598 (Colo.App.2007).B. Expert BiasGuardian next asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in prohibiting him from cross-e......
Request a trial to view additional results