Appel v. Allstate Insurance Company
Citation | 2005 NY Slip Op 06178,20 A.D.3d 367,799 N.Y.S.2d 467 |
Decision Date | 28 July 2005 |
Docket Number | 6100. |
Parties | ROBIN APPEL, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
In this action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (b) to collect on a default judgment entered in an underlying June 2000 dog bite case in favor of plaintiff and against Allstate's insureds, it is undisputed that Allstate's insureds were served with process on August 1, 2000, but never responded to the complaint and never notified Allstate until after the default judgment for $101,069 was entered against them on April 24, 2001. Thereafter, by letter dated May 21, 2002 to its insureds with a copy to plaintiff's attorney in the underlying action, Allstate disclaimed coverage "to [the insureds] and anyone else seeking coverage under the policy for you" based on the insureds' failure to give prompt notice and referencing the underlying action. Just over a week later, on May 29, 2002, plaintiff's attorney served a copy of the default judgment with notice of entry on Allstate, and then commenced this action to collect on such judgment.
Allstate sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it had previously obtained a default judgment against its insureds declaring that it had no duty to defend or indemnify them due to their failure to give timely notice of plaintiff's claim. As a result, Allstate argued, it does not have a duty to indemnify plaintiff.
In granting Allstate's motion, the IAS court held that because Allstate is not liable to its insureds, it cannot be liable to plaintiff; that its disclaimer letter did not have to be addressed to plaintiff or explicitly name her, and was otherwise sufficient; and that it did not have to disclaim specifically based upon plaintiff's own failure to timely notify it since notice, albeit untimely, had already been given to it by its insureds (citing Ringel v Blue Ridge Ins. Co., 293 AD2d 460, 462 [2002] and Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co. v Flood, 128 AD2d 683, 684 [1987], lv denied 70 NY2d 612 [1987]).
Where the insured fails to give proper notice, the injured party can give notice herself, thereby preserving her right to proceed directly against the insurer. "Having been statutorily granted an independent right to give notice and recover directly from the insurer, the injured party or other claimant is not to be charged vicariously with the insured's delay (Lauritano v American Fid. Fire Ins. Co., 3 AD2d 564 [1957], affd 4 NY2d 1028)" (Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v National Union Fire Ins. Co., 251 AD2d 216, 220 [1998]). In determining the reasonableness of an injured party's notice, the notice required is measured less rigidly than that required of the insureds (see Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v NIBA Constr., 195 AD2d 425, 427 [1993] [Sullivan, J.P., concurring])....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Continental Ins. Co. v. Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co.
... 603 F.3d 169 . CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, . v. . ATLANTIC CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, .... . Appel v. Allstate Ins. Co., 20 A.D.3d 367, 368, 799 N.Y.S.2d 467 (2005) ......
-
Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Rong Rong Sun
...to abrogate any duty of an injured party to make a reasonable effort, judged by “the means available” to it ( Appel v. Allstate Ins. Co., 20 A.D.3d 367, 369, 799 N.Y.S.2d 467 [1st Dept. 2005] [internal quotation marks omitted] ), to give notice to an insurer pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420......
-
Golebiewski v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A.
...182). Consequently, National Union is not estopped from now raising the defense of untimely notice ( see Appel v. Allstate Ins. Co., 20 A.D.3d 367, 799 N.Y.S.2d 467;Rochester v. Quincy Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 10 A.D.3d at 418, 781 N.Y.S.2d 139). However, the evidence showed, as a matter of law,......
-
McGlynn v. Harris
..., 79 A.D.3d 1348, 915 N.Y.S.2d 180 ; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Marcone , 29 A.D.3d 715, 815 N.Y.S.2d 235 ; Appel v. Allstate Ins. Co. , 20 A.D.3d 367, 799 N.Y.S.2d 467 ). Accordingly, the law firm defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them s......