Arenado v. Florida Power & Light Co., 4-86-2970
| Decision Date | 02 March 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 4-86-2970,4-86-2970 |
| Citation | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 568,523 So.2d 628 |
| Parties | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 568 Edward ARENADO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Susanna Arenado, Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Richard A. Kupfer of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth & Romano, West Palm Beach, and Marc Postelnek, Miami, for appellant.
Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Susanna Arenado (Arenado) was killed in an automobile accident. The question we are asked to decide is whether or not, under the precise facts of this case, Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) owed a duty to Arenado.
At 1:00 a.m., Arenado was driving her car in an easterly direction. Another driver, not involved in this case, was driving in a southerly direction. The overhead traffic signal which controlled the intersection these cars were approaching was inoperative because, several minutes earlier, FPL's transmission line went down and interrupted the flow of electricity to the traffic light. Both vehicles entered the intersection and collided, causing fatal injuries to Arenado. The alleged cause of the interruption of the electric service was the negligence of FPL.
The appellant claims that the duty of FPL arises from one or more of three sources: (1) a statutory duty, (2) a contractual duty, and (3) a duty under the common law of torts.
The statutory duty is claimed to be found in section 366.03, Florida Statutes (1981), which requires each public utility to furnish each person applying for service sufficient, adequate and efficient service. The trial judge struck the allegations claiming a statutory duty from previous complaints upon the basis that violation of the statute and administrative regulations did not create a private cause of action. For much the same reasons we will discuss, we agree with this ruling.
The leading case deciding the duty of a public utility upon the theories of breach of contractual and common law tort is H.R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co., 247 N.Y. 160, 159 N.E. 896 (1928), authored by Chief Justice Cardozo.
With regard to the contractual theory, which involved the doctrine of third party beneficiary, the court stated:
In a broad sense it is true that every city contract not improvident or wasteful, is for the benefit of the public. More than this, however, must be shown to give a right of action to a member of the public not formally a party. The benefit, as it is sometimes said, must be one that is not merely incidental and secondary.... It must be primary and immediate in such a sense and to such a degree as to bespeak the assumption of a duty to make reparation directly to the individual members of the public if the benefit is lost.
The court also pointed out that
[b]y...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Clay Elec. Co-Op., Inc. v. Johnson
...water company is the measure of its duty to the property owner.'" Id. at 614 (quoting Mugge, 42 So. at 86). Thus, our unanimous decision in Arenado acknowledges that the contracts in Mugge and Woodbury were the defining source of the duty. The concurring opinion's contrary interpretation of......
-
Florida Power & Light Co. v. Goldberg
...company. Landrum v. Florida Power & Light Co., 505 So.2d 552, 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). For example, in Arenado v. Florida Power & Light Co., 523 So.2d 628, 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), the court found that a utility company did not assume a common law tort duty to a motorist involved in an auto ......
-
White v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.
... ... County of Los Angeles owed no duty to plaintiff to light the streets, SCE also owed no duty to plaintiff to maintain ... A public utility, which negligently places a power pole too close to the road, may be liable to the [25 ... of Virgin Islands (3d Cir.1991) 938 F.2d 427; Arenado v. Florida Power & Light Company (Fla.App. 4 Dist.1988) 523 ... ...
-
Rehab. Ctr. at Hollywood Hills, LLC v. Fla. Power & Light Co.
...Indeed, the few cases which have touched on the issue have all determined that no such duty exists. See Arenado v. Fla. Power & Light Co. , 523 So. 2d 628, 629 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), rev. dismissed , 541 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 1989) (holding utility did not assume duty to general public to supply e......
-
Table of Authorities
...Table of Authorities Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Iowa, 485 N.W.2d 465 (Iowa 1992), 327n8, 330n14 Arenado v. Florida Power & Light Co., 523 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988 ), 61n143 Arizona Corp. Comm’n v. Arizona, 830 P.2d 807 (Ariz. 1992), 4n7 Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka......
-
2 The Traditional Utility Monopoly
...the utility should assume that plaintiff would “forgo [sic] other protective measures”); see also Arenado v. Fla. Power & Light Co . , 523 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988) (holding that a utility owes no duty to a driver killed in an accident because of service disruption to a trafic l......