Arkansas Southern Ry. Co. v. German Nat. Bank
Citation | 92 S.W. 522 |
Parties | ARKANSAS SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. GERMAN NAT. BANK. |
Decision Date | 20 January 1906 |
Court | Supreme Court of Arkansas |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Union County; James S. Steel, Judge.
Action by the German National Bank against the Arkansas Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Rose, Hemingway & Rose and Gaughan & Sifford, for appellant. Ratcliffe & Fletcher and Smead & Powell, for appellee.
The German National Bank brought an action against the Arkansas Southern Railway Company, to recover the value of cotton on bills of lading issued by the company for the cotton, and assigned to the bank; the cotton never having been delivered.
The facts in the case are substantially as follows: Alphin & Lake Cotton Company were dealers in cotton at Little Rock, Ark., and were the principal owners of a compress at El Dorado. They purchased cotton at Bernice, La., and at Junction City, Ark., and at other places along the road of the railroad company. At Bernice the cotton purchased was paid for by the Bank of Bernice and shipped in its name over the railroad of the defendant to El Dorado, a terminus of the railroad, about 30 miles from Bernice. Bills of lading were issue to the shipper in which it undertook to deliver the cotton to shipper's order at its destination. They were forwarded to the Bank of Little Rock with drafts on Alphin & Lake Cotton Company attached for collection. Nine hundred and fifty one bales of cotton were purchased by Alphin & Lake and shipped in the name of the Bank of Bernice over defendant's road from Bernice to El Dorado. Bills of lading were issued for all of them, and forwarded to the Bank of Little Rock with drafts attached in the manner indicated.
The cotton was treated as belonging to Alphin & Lake Cotton Company and was delivered without taking up the bills of lading.
The German National Bank lost the cotton. It was delivered to other parties. The bank recovered judgment in this action; and the defendant appealed.
Is appellant responsible for the loss of the cotton?
At common law a bill of lading is a muniment of title to the goods or property therein specified, is a symbol or representative of the goods, North Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Commercial Bank of Ohio, 123 U. S. 727, 734, 736, 8 Sup. Ct. 266, 31 L. Ed. 287; The Thames, 14 Wall. 98, 20 L. Ed. 804; Hutchinson on Carriers (2d Ed.) §§ 129, 130; Daniel on Negotiable Instruments, §§ 1728, 1731.
The responsibility of the carrier for the goods continues after their arrival at the place of destination, until they are ready to be delivered and the owner or consignee has had a reasonable time and opportunity to examine them and take them away. If they are not called for by the party entitled to them within that time, it is the duty of the carrier to retain them until they are claimed or store them prudently for and on account of their owner. When his responsibility as a carrier ceases he becomes liable for the goods as a warehouseman. He is responsible, either as carrier or warehouseman, until the goods are properly delivered. The bill of lading is evidence of that obligation. North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank, 123 U. S. 727, 734, 736, 8 Sup. Ct. 266, 31 L. Ed. 287; The Thames, 14 Wall. 98, 20 L. Ed. 804; The Titania (D. C.) 124 Fed. 975; Blumenthal v. Brainerd, 38 Vt. 402, 91 Am. Dec. 350.
For the enforcement of these duties and the protection of the parties in interest, the statutes of this state, provide: "Warehouse receipts given by any warehouseman, wharfinger or other person or firm for any goods, wares, merchandise, cotton, grain, flour or other produce or commodity, stored or deposited, and all bills of lading and transportation receipts of every kind given by any carrier * * * may be transferred in writing thereon, and the delivery thereof so indorsed, and any and all persons to whom the same may be transferred shall be deemed and held to be the owner of such goods, wares, merchandise, cotton, grain, flour or other produce or commodity, so far as to give validity to any pledge, lien or transfer given, made or created thereby, as on the faith thereof, and no property so stored or deposited, as specified in such bills of lading or receipts, shall be delivered except on surrender and cancellation of such receipts and bills of lading; provided, that all such receipts and bills of lading which shall have the words, `not negotiable', plainly written or stamped on the face thereof, shall be exempt from the provisions of this act." Kirby's Dig. § 530.
And the act further provides: "Any warehouseman, wharfinger, forwarder or other person who shall violate any of the provisions of this act shall be deemed guilty of a criminal offense, and upon indictment and conviction shall be fined in any sum not exceeding five thousand dollars, or imprisoned in the penitentiary of this state not exceeding five years, or both; and all and every person or persons aggrieved by the violation of any of the provisions of this act may maintain an action at law against the person or persons, corporation or corporations violating any of the provisions of this act, to recover all damages which he or they may have sustained by reason of any such violation as aforesaid, before any court of competent jurisdiction, whether such person or persons shall have been convicted of fraud as aforesaid under this act or...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Arkansas Southern Railway Company v. German National Bank
-
N. & W. Ry. Co. v. Aylor
...287, 8 Sup.Ct.Rep. 266; Southern R. Co. Atlanta Nat. Bank, 56 L.R.A. 546, 50 C.C.A. 558, 112 Fed. 861; Arkansas S.R. Co. German Nat. Bank 77 Ark. 482, 92 S.W. 522, 113 Am.St.Rep. 160; Illinois C.R. Co. Southern Bank, 41 Ill.App. 287; Libby Ingalls, 124 Mass. 503; Union Stock Yards Co. Westc......