Arkansas Southern Railway Company v. German National Bank
Decision Date | 20 January 1906 |
Citation | 92 S.W. 522,77 Ark. 482 |
Parties | ARKANSAS SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. GERMAN NATIONAL BANK |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Union Circuit Court; JAMES S. STEEL, Judge; on Exchange of Circuits; affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Gaughan & Sifford and Rose, Hemingway & Rose, for appellant.
1. Delivery by the railroad company to the compress company designated by the shipper in the bills of lading was a complete compliance with the contract, and released it from further liability. 29 Wis. 611; 2 Am. Rep. 577; 45 Barb. 502; 111 Mass. 163; 9 Barb. 158; 14 Wall. 98; 16 N.Y. 515; 48 Ill 425; 77 Ga. 376. If freight is not called for at destination within a reasonable time, the carrier may deliver it to a warehouse and relieve itself of further liability. 39 Ark 487; 1 Denio, 45; 43 Am. Dec. 649; 45 N.Y. 77.
2. The statute relied on by appellee is in conflict with the interstate commerce clause of the U. S. Constitution. 122 U.S. 347; 169 U.S. 314; 174 U.S. 580; 158 U.S. 98; 196 U.S 194; 24 How, 169; 8 Wall, 123; Judson, Interstate Com., § 7.
3. Lake, who had obtained the bills of lading and, subsequent to the delivery of the cotton, with his knowledge and acquiescence, to the compress company of which he was president and manager, transferred them to appellee, cannot be heard to complain that the deliveries were made without the bills of lading. 60 N.W. 583; 66 N.W. 419. Appellee acquired no greater rights than Lake (1) because the bills were spent, past due and dishonored paper (9 M. & W. 647; 69 N.Y.S. 396; 19 La.Ann. 262; 73 Mo. 669; 42 Mo.App. 284); (2) because the shipping directions in the bills were sufficient to put it on inquiry (Tiedeman, Com. Paper, § 295; 4 Cush. 456).
Smead & Powell and Ratcliffe & Fletcher, for appellee; Moore & Smith, of counsel.
1. The object of the bills of lading was not to represent the cotton merely while in transit, but until delivery. Its liability did not end with delivery to the compress company. 123 U.S. 734-755; 111 Ind. 5; 38 Vt. 402; 72 N.Y. 615; 60 Ark. 375; 124 F. 975; 29 P. 861; 16 N.Y. 518. The railroad company, by the terms of the contract, could deliver only to the order of the shipper. After storing the cotton, the liability of the railroad became that of a warehouseman, and the compress company would be treated as the agent of the railroad. 14 Wall. 98; 123 U.S. 735; 32 F. 54; 63 F. 393; 111 Ind. 5; 65 N.W. 29; 106 N.Y. 579; 13 Mo.App. 263; 71 Mo. 203; 29 P. 861. The clause in contract limiting liability to time of arrival is invalid. 57 Ark. 112; Ib. 127; 60 Ark. 104; 24 S.E. 166. If appellant could divest itself of further liability by delivery to the compress company, it was required to deliver for account of holder of the bills of lading, and failure to do so would make it liable. 33 S.W. 521; 72 N.Y. 615; 15 N.E. 782; 16 Mich. 493; 33 N.Y. 610; 124 Mass. 503; 22 Ohio St. 324; 51 Vt. 92; 71 N.E. 685; 123 U.S. 723. Bills of lading are made negotiable by written indorsement. Kirby's Digest, § 529. Property named in such bills of lading cannot be delivered except on surrender and cancellation thereof. Ib., § 530. Company is forbidden to permit the property to be shipped, transferred or removed without written consent of holder of bills of lading. Ib., § 527. See, also, 102 N.Y. 120; 23 S.W. 521; 25 S.C. 223; 64 Ark. 169; 55 Ark. 524.
2. The statute is a mere police regulation, protecting holders of bills of lading, and not in conflict with interstate law. 169 U.S. 133; 49 Ark. 291; 93 U.S. 99; 128 U.S. 96; 165 U.S. 628; 163 U.S. 299; 162 U.S. 650; 107 U.S. 38; 156 U.S. 590; 171 U.S. 1; 82 F. 839.
3. The right to the bills of lading passed from Bank of Little Rock to appellee. The latter is not required to rely upon the title of Alphin & Lake Cotton Co. 56 F. 369; 63 F. 391; 66 F. 862; 65 F. 848; Jones on Pledges and Collateral Securities, § 44 et seq.; 32 N.Y.S. 604. See, also, 33 S.W. 521. Appellee had the right to assume that the cotton was in possession of the appellant, and that it would not permit it to pass from its control without taking up the bills of lading. Appellee was not required to make prompt demand or to give notice of transfer of the bills. 102 N.Y. 120; 33 S.W. 521; 14 Wall. 98.
The German National Bank brought an action against the Arkansas Southern Railway Company, to recover the value of cotton on bills of lading issued by the company for the cotton and assigned to the bank; the cotton never having been delivered.
The facts in the case are substantially as follows: Alphin & Lake Cotton Company were dealers in cotton at Little Rock, Arkansas, and were the principal owners of a compress at El Dorado. They purchased cotton at Bernice, La., and at Junction City, Ark., and at other places along the road of the railroad company. At Bernice the cotton purchased was paid for by the Bank of Bernice and shipped in its name over the railroad of the defendant to El Dorado, a terminus of the railroad, about thirty miles from Bernice. Bills of lading were issued to the shipper in which it undertook to deliver the cotton to shipper's order at its destination. They were forwarded to the Bank of Little Rock with drafts on Alphin & Lake Cotton Company attached for collection. Nine hundred and fifty-one bales of cotton were purchased by Alphin & Lake, and shipped in the name of the Bank of Bernice over defendant's road from Bernice to El Dorado. Bills of lading were issued for all of them, and forwarded to the Bank of Little Rock with drafts attached in the manner indicated.
The cotton was treated as belonging to Alphin & Lake Cotton Compress Company, and was delivered without taking up the bills of lading.
The German National Bank lost the cotton. It...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
N. P. Sloan Company v. Barham
... ... The ... contract was an Arkansas one. The laws of Louisiana did not ... apply and ... with his local bank. The warehouse people proceeded to load ... out ... Barham had the cashier of the Citizens National Bank at El ... Dorado--the bank with which the ... See Arkansas ... Southern Ry. Co. v. German National Bank, 77 ... Ark ... ...
-
Dewberry-Hargett Company v. Arkansas State Bank
... ... delivery thereof to the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway ... Company and the issuance of the bills of lading by it and ... ...
-
Prescott & Northwestern Railway Company v. Davis
... ... to ship from Prescott, Arkansas, via East St. Louis over the ... Mo. Pac. R. R. to ... with some bank, which would forward for delivery upon payment ... of such ... ...
-
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Mabry
... ... from Horatio, Arkansas, over defendant's railroad, to ... Kansas City, Missouri, consigned to ... dealer was to be notified. He drew a draft in favor of the ... Bank of Horatio on the dealer in Kansas City and attached the ... bill of ... In ... Arkansas Southern Railway Co. v. German National ... Bank, 77 Ark. 482, 92 S.W. 522, Judge BATTLE, speaking ... ...