Arkansas State Highway and Transp. Dept. v. Breshears

Decision Date30 March 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80-320,80-320
Citation272 Ark. 244,613 S.W.2d 392
PartiesARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Self-Insured Employer, Petitioner, v. Johnnie M. BRESHEARS, Employee, Respondent.
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Robert L. Wilson, Little Rock, for petitioner.

William C. Gilliam, Malvern, for respondent.

ADKISSON, Chief Justice.

Johnnie M. Breshears suffered an injury to his back while painting a ceiling for his employer, the Arkansas Highway Department. The Workers' Compensation Commission, in sustaining the administrative law judge, found temporary total disability from the date of the injury through the healing period. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Ark. Hwy. & Transp. Dep't v. Breshears, 271 Ark. 398, 609 S.W.2d 81 (Ark.App. 1980). We granted certiorari to review the legal basis of the Court of Appeals' decision in affirming the Commission.

The Court of Appeals relies upon Pyles v. Triple F. Feeds of Texas, 270 Ark. 729, 606 S.W.2d 146 (Ark.App. 1980) which incorrectly held that temporary total disability and the healing period were, in all cases, the same because, as the court stated: "While the wording of the act is not entirely clear, it seems more logical to ascribe to the Legislature an intent that an employee in Arkansas, suffering an unscheduled first injury, is to be paid compensation for the healing period as is done in case of a second injury or for a scheduled injury."

I

We hold that the term "disability" as defined below controls compensation awards in all cases of temporary disability except where compensation is statutorily based upon the "healing period." The Legislature specifically defines these terms in Ark.Stat.Ann. § 81-1302(e) and (f) (Repl. 1976):

(e) 'Disability' means incapacity because of injury to earn, in the same or any other employment, the wages which the employee was receiving at the time of the injury.

(f) 'Healing Period' means that period for healing of the injury resulting from the accident.

The term "disability" is then used in Ark.Stat.Ann. § 81-1313(a) (Repl. 1976) which controls this case:

(a) Total Disability. In case of total disability there shall be paid to the injured employee during the continuance of such total disability sixty-six and two thirds per cent (662/3%) of his average weekly wage.

The term "healing period" is noticeably absent from this particular compensation provision although it appears in two other compensation subsections of § 81-1313: (c), providing for scheduled permanent injury compensation; and (f), providing for second injury compensation. See International Paper Co. v. McGoogan, 255 Ark. 1025, 504 S.W.2d 739 (1974), a scheduled injury case.

Temporary disability is determined by the extent to which a compensable injury has affected a claimant's ability to earn a livelihood based on medical evidence, age, education, experience, and other matters reasonably expected to affect the claimant's earning power. See Rooney & Travelers Insurance Co. v. Charles, 262 Ark. 695, 560 S.W.2d 797 (1978).

Temporary total disability is that period within the healing period in which the employee suffers a total incapacity to earn wages. Ark.Stat.Ann. §§ 81-1302(e) and -1313(a). Whereas temporary partial disability is that period within the healing period in which the employee suffers only a decrease in his capacity to earn the wages he was receiving at the time of the injury. Ark.Stat.Ann. § 81-1302(e) and -1313(b).

II

There is substantial evidence of record to support the Commission's finding that the claimant suffered temporary total disability...

To continue reading

Request your trial
72 cases
  • Allen v. Workers' Compensation Com'r and Consolidation Coal Co.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 2, 1984
    ... ... State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, W.Va. 256 ... 729, 606 S.W.2d 146 (1980), modified, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Dept. v ... ...
  • Tyson Poultry, Inc. v. Narvaiz
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 15, 2012
    ... ... 113.Supreme Court of Arkansas.March 15, 2012 ... [388 S.W.3d 17]Emma Diane ... Ark. State Hwy. & Transp. Dep't v. Breshears, 272 Ark. 244, ... ...
  • Texas General Indem. Co. v. Speakman, 05-86-00334-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 13, 1987
    ... ... 317, 320 (Tex.App.--Tyler 1983, no writ); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v ... ...
  • Arkansas Dept. of Health v. Williams
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • October 20, 1993
    ... ... Badshah but "he is out-of-town." Dr. McAlister goes on to state that the appellee complained of soreness in her arm area from her elbows ... In Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Breshears, 272 Ark. 244, 613 [43 Ark.App. 176] S.W.2d 392 ... This case is not like Wright v. American Transp., 18 Ark.App. 18, 709 S.W.2d 107 (1986). There the Commission in a two ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT