Armstrong v. State

Decision Date16 May 1994
Docket NumberNo. S93G1827,S93G1827
PartiesARMSTRONG v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Neil L. Heimanson, Darien, for Armstrong.

Dupont K. Cheney, Dist. Atty., Atlantic Judicial Circuit, Charles D. Howard, Asst. Dist. Atty., Hinesville, for the State.

THOMPSON, Justice.

Defendant was convicted for the sale of crack cocaine and sentenced to life imprisonment in accordance with OCGA § 16-13-30(d). On appeal to the Court of Appeals, defendant asserted the state did not give him notice pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-2(a) that it intended to use his prior drug conviction in aggravation of punishment. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the state need not give a repeat drug offender notice that it plans to use a prior drug conviction in aggravation. Armstrong v. State, 209 Ga.App. 796, 434 S.E.2d 560 (1993). In a special concurrence, three judges disagreed with the majority's conclusion that notice of aggravation need not be given to a repeat drug offender, but determined that defendant received the requisite notice because he was advised of the state's intent to present similar transaction evidence at trial. Id. We granted certiorari to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

1. "This court has indicated [previously] that before the state can seek a life sentence under § 16-13-30(d), the state must give notice before trial under § 17-10-2(a) of the conviction the state plans to use in aggravation. State v. Hendrixson, 251 Ga. 853 (310 SE2d 526) (1984)." Edwards v. State, 260 Ga. 121, 122, 390 S.E.2d 580 (1990). We now so hold and reiterate that if a life sentence is to be imposed under OCGA § 16-13-30(d), the state must notify defendant of any conviction it intends to use in aggravation of punishment pursuant to OCGA § 17-10-2(a).

2. Providing notice of intent to present similar transaction evidence does not vitiate the state's need to give notice that it plans to use a prior conviction in aggravation of punishment. The purpose of § 17-10-2 is to give defendant a chance " 'to examine his record to determine if the convictions are in fact his, if he was represented by counsel, and any other defect which would render such documents inadmissible during the pre-sentencing phase of the trial.' Herring v. State, 238 Ga. 288, 290 (232 SE2d 826) (1977)." Roberts v. State, 252 Ga. 227, 240(11), 314 S.E.2d 83 (1984). This purpose is not served by the similar transaction notice.

When a defendant is given notice that a conviction will be used in aggravation of punishment, he can challenge the validity of the conviction, not its similarity. Roberts v. State, supra. Unless given notice of intent to use a previous conviction in aggravation of punishment, a defendant will not "be on notice" that he should explore defects which could render the document inadmissible. Id. It follows that the state cannot fulfill its responsibility under OCGA § 17-10-2(a) by relying solely on a notice of similar transactions. Edwards v. State, supra. Cf. Moss v. State, 206 Ga.App. 310, 312, 425 S.E.2d 386 (1992) (state's notice that it intended to present evidence of prior convictions as similar transactions, coupled with oral notice that it intended to seek a life sentence under recidivist statute, fulfilled the purpose of notification...

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 cases
  • Von Thomas v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 9, 2013
    ...290 Ga. 392, 400(9), 721 S.E.2d 855 (2012); Hightower v. State, 287 Ga. 586, 594(10), 698 S.E.2d 312 (2010); Armstrong v. State, 264 Ga. 237, 239(3), 442 S.E.2d 759 (1994); Williams v. State, 301 Ga.App. 731, 733(3), 688 S.E.2d 650 (2009); Battise v. State, 295 Ga.App. 833, 835(1), 673 S.E.......
  • Demetrios v. State, A00A1766.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 24, 2000
    ...Demetrios on November 18, 1994, four days prior to the sentencing hearing. 17. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Armstrong v. State, 264 Ga. 237(2), 442 S.E.2d 759 (1994); Hatcher v. State, 224 Ga.App. 747, 750(2)(a), 482 S.E.2d 443 (1997). 18. Fugitt v. State, 256 Ga. 292, 296, 348 S.E.......
  • Young v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • January 23, 2012
    ...the alleged failure of the State to inform him of his prior convictions that would be entered into evidence. See Armstrong v. State, 264 Ga. 237, 238(1), 442 S.E.2d 759 (1994); Gates v. State, 229 Ga. 796, 797(4), 194 S.E.2d 412 (1972). However, Appellant did not raise an objection during t......
  • Morgan v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 2007
    ...prior convictions, however, so any claim that the trial court erred in admitting such evidence was waived. See Armstrong v. State, 264 Ga. 237, 239(3), 442 S.E.2d 759 (1994). 7. Finally, Morgan claims that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his convictions. As discussed herein, howe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Torts - Cynthia Trimboli Adams and Charles R. Adams Iii
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 47-1, September 1995
    • Invalid date
    ...a plaintiff seeks damages against a media defendant for speech of public concern." Philadelphia Newspapers, 475 U.S. at 777. 301. Cox, 264 Ga. at 237, 442 S.E.2d at 742. 302. See supra note 294 and accompanying text. 303. See supra note 124 and accompanying text. 304. Under the ancient miti......
  • Criminal Law - Frank C. Mills, Iii
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...v. State, 202 Ga. App. 100, 413 S.E.2d 517 (1991) and O.C.G.A. Sec. 17-10-2(b) (1990). 602. 209 Ga. App. 796,434 S.E.2d 560 (1993), affd, 264 Ga. 237,442 S.E.2d 759 (1994). 603. Armstrong v. State, 264 Ga. 237, 238, 442 S.E.2d 759, 760 (1994). 604. Id. 605. See supra notes 11-22 and accompa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT