ASI, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission
| Decision Date | 23 June 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 48210,48210 |
| Citation | 334 So.2d 594 |
| Parties | ASI, INC., Petitioner, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Sol H. Proctor of Proctor & Cain, Jacksonville, for petitioner.
Prentice P. Pruitt and Cynthia S. Joachim, Tallahassee, and Norman J. Bolinger of Schwartz, Bolinger & Peterson, Jacksonville, for respondent.
By petition for writ of certiorari, ASI, Inc., (ASI) seeks to overturn the award to Airco Air Freight Delivery, Inc. (Airco) by the Public Service Commission of for-hire Permit No. 2261. The Constitution confers jurisdiction on this Court to 'issue writs of certiorari to commissions established by general law having statewide jurisdiction.' Art. V § 3(b)(3). The Public Service Commission was established by Section 350.011, Florida Statutes (1975), and exercises statewide jurisdiction, but we deny the petition for writ of certiorari, because we believe the petition lacks merit.
Airco filed an application with the Public Service Commission on March 28, 1975, pursuant to Section 323.05, Florida Statutes (1975), seeking authority to transport 'delayed, misplaced and/or misrouted baggage . . . from the Jacksonville International Airport' to specified points in northeast Florida, the points of destination being restated in an amended application. Airco sought authority limited to 'single, casual and nonrecurring trips performed only occasionally and without solicitation.' ASI filed a protest requesting that Airco's application be denied or, in the alternative, that a public hearing be held to determine whether the proposed transportation was for hire or, alternatively, whether the permit was required by public convenience and necessity.
Airco moved to strike ASI's protest on the ground that ASI had no standing to oppose the application and on the ground that 'the service proposed by Airco is not common carriage.' In Order No. 12069, the Commission entered an order striking ASI's protest and issued for-hire Permit No. 2261, thereby granting Airco's application, one commissioner dissenting. To supply an inadvertent omission, an amended order was unanimously entered. Order No. 12069--A. ASI filed a petition for reconsideration, which the Commission denied after hearing argument by the parties, one commissioner dissenting. Order No. 12322. ASI sought review in this Court of the Commission's orders by filing a petition for writ of certiorari here.
The parties agree to the general proposition that the administrative procedure act, Section 120.50 Et seq., Florida Statutes (1975) applies to proceedings before the Public Service Commission, except where specifically provided otherwise. See Florida Retail Federation, Inc. v. Mayo, 331 So.2d 308 (Fla.1976); Gator Freightways Inc. v. Mayo, 328 So.2d 444 (Fla.1976). The particular statute under which the Commission acted in this instance, however, provides, as follows:
No motor carrier shall operate any for-hire motor vehicle on any public highway in this state in the transportation of persons or property for compensation without first having obtained from the commission a permit, Which permit shall issue as a matter of right and of course when the provisions of this part and the laws of the state touching such motor vehicle operation have been complied with by the applicant.
Section 323.05(1), Florida Statutes (1975) (emphasis supplied)
The Commission heard ASI's arguments on petition for reconsideration, but no fact finding hearing took place at any stage of the proceedings.
ASI asserted a hearing was necessary 'to determine . . . if public convenience and necessity require the grant of' a permit to Airco. Section 323.05(1) Florida Statutes (1975) does not require any determination as to public convenience and necessity before granting for-hire permits. Such permits are to issue 'as a matter of right.' Id. We are unable to conclude that the Commission's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Florida Medical Ass'n v. Department of Professional Regulation
...ophthalmologists in particular, have "no legally recognized interest in being free from competition ...," ASI, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission, 334 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla.1976), it by no means follows that the assertion of interest economic in nature can never furnish the basis for s......
-
Connecticut State Medical Soc. v. Connecticut Bd. of Examiners in Podiatry
...the premise that physicians ... have 'no legally recognized interest in being free from competition ...,' ASI, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission, 334 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla.1976), it by no means follows that the assertion of interest economic in nature can never furnish the basis for s......
-
Sickon v. School Bd. of Alachua County, Fla.
...action at issue did not "represent a new Commission action affecting appellant's substantive rights"); ASI, Inc. v. Florida Public Serv. Comm'n, 334 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla.1976) (rejecting proposition that "procedural requirements established by the administrative procedure act" confer "substa......
-
Department of Professional Regulation, Bd. of Dentistry v. Florida Dental Hygienist Ass'n, Inc., 90-3401
...as sufficient to confer upon a trade or professional association standing to challenge a proposed rule. Cf. ASI, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commission, 334 So.2d 594 (Fla.1976); Florida Medical Association v. Department of Professional Regulation, 426 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); and......