Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Madden, Sykes & Co.
Decision Date | 01 June 1907 |
Parties | ATCHISON, T. & S. F. RY. CO. v. MADDEN, SYKES & CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Cooke County; D. E. Barrett, Judge.
Action by Madden, Sykes & Co. against the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
J. W. Terry, A. H. Culwell, and Garnett & Eldridge, for appellants. Davis & Thomason, for appellee.
Appellees instituted this suit in the district court to recover the value of certain merchandise alleged to have been shipped from Chicago over the line of appellant's road, and destined to Ardmore, Ind. T., and which, it was alleged, had never been delivered. Appellant answered by general demurrer, general denial, and specially that, if said goods were delivered to appellant and thereafter lost, the loss was not occasioned by its negligence, but said goods had been injured and destroyed in a flood of the Kaw and Missouri rivers at Kansas City, Mo which submerged the cars in which the goods were contained; that this flood was unexpected and unprecedented, and an act of God that could not have been provided against. There was a trial before a jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees for the sum of $1,105, from which judgment this appeal has been prosecuted.
The evidence shows that appellees' merchandise was delivered to appellant, as alleged, and by appellant transported from Chicago as far as Kansas City. The cars in which the merchandise was shipped were placed by appellant in its yards at the last-named city. The first car arrived at 3:15 p. m. on May 28, 1903; the second car arrived at 3:15 a. m. of the 29th day of said May; and the third car arrived at Kansas City at 8:15 p. m. of May 29th. The flood had been growing since about the middle of May, and on the night of May 29th the Kaw river got out of its banks, and the flood reached its height May 31st and June 1st, when it attained a stage of from 12 to 16 feet over appellant's yards at Kansas City, and appellees' goods were thereby rendered substantially worthless. On the night of May 29th appellant had all of its west-bound business made up into trains with engines attached and crews on duty, ready to depart from its yards, when it was ascertained that the water had overflowed the track at Holiday, Kan., which is west of Kansas City, to such an extent that trains could not pass through. The crews were thereupon released, and the engines sent to the engine house. On May 30th appellant, with all the means at its command, began to move the cars in its yards to higher ground, and continued to so do until the water put out the fire in its engines and stopped them from working.
The officer in charge of the United States Weather Bureau at Kansas City testified that he issued daily bulletins containing gauge readings at points on the Missouri river, with comments on anticipated flood in the shape of warnings; that the bulletins were published to newspapers and the public generally, and were issued from May 26th until after the flood subsided; that on May 30 and 31, 1903, very few reports were sent out by mail, because of the fact that telegraphic facilities for gathering news had been greatly impaired and train service was crippled. On May 26th the following warning was issued: On May 27th the following warning was issued: On May 29, 1903, the following warning was issued: This witness further testified that no estimate had been placed on the ultimate height that the flood would reach, but that it reached the "danger line" on May 28th; the stage on that morning measuring 21.7 feet. It appears that appellant's line of road extends up the Kaw river to Topeka, some...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Mullin
... ... 697, 64 Am. Dec. 394; Crosby v. Fitch, 12 Conn. 410, ... 31 Am. Dec. 745; Henry v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R ... Co., 83 Kan. 104, 109 P. 1005, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1088; ... Davis v. Wabash, ... R. Co. v. Coutourie, ... 135 F. 465, 68 C. C. A. 177; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co ... v. Madden, Sykes & Co., 46 Tex.Civ.App. 597, 103 S.W ... 1193. See, also, Benedict Pineapple Co. v ... ...
-
Wertheimer, Swartz Shoe Company v. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company
...Under the testimony, the verdict on both counts should have been for plaintiff. Memorandum of Trial Judge, rec. p. 220; Railroad v. Madden, 103 S.W. 1193; Fentiman Railroad, 44 Tex.Cir. 462; Pinkerton v. Railway, 117 Mo.App. 293. OPINION GOODE, J. Plaintiff filed this action to recover for ......
-
Armstrong, Byrd & Co. v. Ill. Cent. R. Co.
...favor of the defendant in error by the trial court should be affirmed. We are referred to the case of A., T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Madden, Sykes & Co., 46 Tex. Civ. App. 597, 103 S.W. 1193, as being contrary thereto. In that case, the co- operating negligence consisted in the improper location ......
-
Crom v. Cameron County
...to the 'hearsay' rule. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Stearnes, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W. 646; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Madden, Sykes & Co., 46 Tex.Civ.App. 597, 103 S.W. 1193. Appellants' sixth and seventh points are overruled. We have examined appellants' Point No. 8, and find ......