Ætna Life Ins. Co v. Davis

Decision Date18 February 1931
Docket NumberNo. 7731.,7731.
Citation172 Ga. 258,157 S.E. 449
PartiesÆTNA LIFE INS. CO. et al. v. DAVIS.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1931.

Syllabus by Editorial Staff.

[Ed. Note—For other definitions of "Administrative, " see Words and Phrases.]

RUSSELL, C. J., and HINES, J., dissenting.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

Proceedings under the Workmen's Compensation Act by C. T. Davis, employee, claimant, opposed by the Ætna Life Insurance Company, insurer, and the Haverty Furniture Company, employer. Judgment of the superior court reversing an award of compensation by the Industrial Commission was reversed, with directions by the Court of Appeals (41 Ga. App. 113, 151 S. E. 812), and the employer and insurer bring certiorari.

Reversed.

C. T. Davis, an employee of the Haverty Furniture Company, suffered an injury May 15, 1928. The employer immediately paid temporary compensation for two weeks and applied to the Industrial Commission to determine whether there was any permanent injury. At the hearing July 10, 1928, Davis, the employee, testified, in substance, that previous to the accident he had not had any trouble with his back and head; that in the accident he was struck on the head by an elevator door; that since that time his hearing was bad; that he could not hear as well as he could before the accident; that his back troubled him and he suffered great pain in his back and head; that, as a result he could not work as he did before the accident, and could not lift without pain and could not carry heavy loads on his shoulder, as he could before the accident; that he was not physically able to do the work he was doing before the accident, on account of his back and head; that he has suffered continually with headache ever since he had the accident, and his ear was troubling him and getting worse.

There was also medical testimony concerning all of the injuries to the claimant's face and head, including an X-ray picture of his head, and also trouble with his ear and back. The Industrial Commissioner made the following finding of fact: "From a preponderance of the testimony, I find as a matter of fact that this claimant has no permanent injury as a result of the accident he sustained while in the employ of Haverty Furniture Company and that he recovered from the injuries sustained in said accident. Also that if he is suffering pains in his back and in his ear, that the same was not produced by the accident, which the medical testimony shows only caused superficial wounds and which could not have produced the ear trouble and the back trouble now complained of by this claimant. I further find from the testimony that there is no connecting link between the injury sustained by the accident and the pains complained of in his back and ears." This award was dated August 18, 1928. On February 14, 1929, Davis applied to the commission for compensation on the ground that there had been "a change in his condition."

A hearing was had February 4, 1929, on this application, at which hearing evidence was introduced to show that Davis suffers from a nervous disorder, has spells of unconsciousness, a fungus growth in the ear, and an intercranial pressure on the brain which an X-ray examination has disclosed. The Industrial Commission made an award March 5, 1929, reversing the award of August 18, 1928, on the ground that there had been a change of condition of the claimant since the date of that award. The employer...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Cromer v. Newberry Cotton Mills
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 28 de novembro de 1942
    ... ... Aetna Insurance Company v. Davis, 172 Ga. 258, 157 ... S.E. 449, and Perry v. American Insurance ... ...
  • Hartford Accident & Indem. Co v. Carroll
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 18 de junho de 1947
    ...for defendant in error. FELTON, Judge. 1. It is the position of the plaintiff in error, relying strongly on Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Davis, 172 Ga. 258, 157 S.E. 449, that the first hearing and the finding of the original director that the aggravation of the claimant's osteo-arthritis, r......
  • Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Carroll
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 18 de junho de 1947
    ...and subject the case to the possibility of review under the terms of Code, § 114-709, should there be a change in condition. In the Davis case, supra, the Supreme apparently disregarded the agreement involved in that case and treated the case as though compensation had been denied in the fi......
  • Chevrolet Division, General Motors Corp. v. Dempsey
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 11 de julho de 1956
    ...the evidence or upon an agreement. This action of the deputy director was based on the decisions of this court in Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Davis, 172 Ga. 258, 157 S.E. 440, and New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarley, 191 Ga. 334, 12 S.E.2d 355. Thereafter, on appeal to the Superior Court of F......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT