Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. New York Life Ins. Co.

Citation187 Mich.App. 276,466 N.W.2d 711
Decision Date29 January 1991
Docket NumberDocket No. 115365
PartiesAUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan — District of US

Brandt, Hanlon, Becker, Lanctot, McCutcheon, Schoolmaster & Taylor by Darleen Lynn Petrosky, Detroit (Cheatham & Acker, P.C., West Bloomfield, by James G. Gross, Detroit, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Fitzgerald, Peters, Dakmak & Miller, P.C. by Neill T. Peters, Detroit, for defendant-appellant.

Before GRIBBS, P.J., and CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals by leave granted from a circuit court order denying defendant's motion for summary disposition. The underlying action involves an attempt by plaintiff no-fault insurer to recover from defendant medical insurer payments made by plaintiff to an insured. The sole issue on appeal is whether the one-year limitation period of M.C.L. § 500.3145(1); M.S.A. § 24.13145(1) applies in this case. We conclude that the limitation period does apply to bar this action, and we reverse the decision of the trial court.

M.C.L. § 500.3145(1); M.S.A. § 24.13145(1) provides:

An action for recovery of personal protection insurance benefits payable under this chapter for accidental bodily injury may not be commenced later than 1 year after the date of the accident causing the injury unless written notice of injury as provided herein has been given to the insurer within 1 year after the accident or unless the insurer has previously made a payment of personal protection insurance benefits for the injury. If the notice has been given or a payment has been made, the action may be commenced at any time within 1 year after the most recent allowable expense, work loss or survivor's loss has been incurred. However, the claimant may not recover benefits for any portion of the loss incurred more than 1 year before the date on which the action was commenced. The notice of injury required by this subsection may be given to the insurer or any of its authorized agents by a person claiming to be entitled to benefits therefor, or by someone in his behalf. The notice shall give the name and address of the claimant and indicate in ordinary language the name of the person injured and the time, place and nature of his injury.

The insured in this case died on October 10, 1984. This action was filed on August 15, 1988.

First, we reject the trial court's finding that § 3145 does not apply because this action involves "other health and accident coverage." Plaintiff paid personal protection benefits to its insured and subsequently sought reimbursement from defendant of a portion of those benefits. "No matter how one characterizes the plaintiff's action, it is, in effect, a suit for recovery of no-fault benefits paid." Badger State Mutual Casualty Ins. Co. v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 128 Mich.App. 120, 127, 339 N.W.2d 713 (1983).

There is a conflict among panels of this Court with regard to whether the one-year period of limitation of § 3145 applies when a no-fault insurer sues another insurer. This Court in two separate two-member majority opinions has ruled that § 3145 is inapplicable to an insurance company's claim for reimbursement of money paid by mistake. See Madden v. Employees Ins. of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Hofmann v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 19 Mayo 1995
    ...February 19, 1992, shall remain in force only until such time as the Court of Appeals' decision in Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 Mich.App. 276, 466 N.W.2d 711 (1991), is reversed by the Michigan Supreme...
  • Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. New York Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 30 Junio 1992
    ...matter how one characterizes the plaintiff's action, it is, in effect, a suit for recovery of no-fault benefits paid.' " 187 Mich.App. 276, 278, 466 N.W.2d 711 (1990). We granted leave to appeal. 439 Mich. 864 As this Court explained in Shavers v. Attorney General, 402 Mich. 554, 578-579, 2......
  • Citizens Ins. Co. of America v. American Community Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 4 Enero 1993
    ...apply. Defendant relied on a decision of this Court that has now been reversed by our Supreme Court. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. New York Life Ins. Co., 187 Mich.App. 276, 466 N.W.2d 711 (1990), rev'd 440 Mich. 126, 485 N.W.2d 695 (1992). The Court held, in a unanimous opinion, that § 3145(1) o......
  • Wieringa v. Blue Care Network
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 3 Octubre 1994
    ...six- year statute of limitations applicable to contract actions. A panel of this Court reversed the trial court's decision, 187 Mich.App. 276, 466 N.W.2d 711 (1991), and concluded that no matter how the action was characterized, it was one for recovery of no-fault benefits paid. Therefore, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT