Ayer v. Robinson

Citation163 Cal.App.2d 424,329 P.2d 546
PartiesGeorge W. AYER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. E. W. ROBINSON et al., Defendants, E. W. Robinson, Appellant. Civ. 22890.
Decision Date11 September 1958
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Bernard B. Cohen and Henry S. Cohen, Beverly Hills, for appellant.

Frank J. Kashare and Henry E. Kappler, Los Angeles, for respondent.

SHINN, Presiding Justice.

The present action is against E. W. Robinson and his son, Ray Robinson, for damages for assault. Defendants filed a joint answer, in which Ray Robinson admitted striking plaintiff, but alleged as an affirmative defense to the action that he did so in self-defense. It was also alleged as a defense that any violence committed by defendants was provoked by plaintiff's vile and abusive language, and by his unlawful 'interference' with E. W. Robinson. After an extended trial, the court made findings and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants for $8,500 compensatory damages and $1,000 exemplary damages. E. W. Robinson appeals from the judgment; Ray Robinson has not appealed.

Plaintiff was employed as a truck driver by John Ferroni, who transported race horses to and from various tracks in California during racing seasons; appellant was one of Ferroni's competitors. On the morning of October 11, 1954, plaintiff drove a van belonging to Ferroni to a railway station near the Hollywood Park race track in order to pick up some harness horses that were scheduled to arrive by train from the east. At the station was a dock which was used primarily for the loading and unloading of freight. Ayer parked the vanbeside the dock and went onto the dock to wait for the train. A driver named Armstrong arrived shortly thereafter in another van. Ayer testified that appellant approached him and asked him what he was doing on the dock. Ayer said that he was there to pick up horses that had been consigned to Ferroni and appellant replied that plaintiff had no business picking up horses at the station.

Ayer returned to the station the following day as the horses he was expecting did not arrive on the 11th. Ferroni came to the dock a few minutes later. Ayer and Ferroni testified that appellant approached them and demanded to know what they were doing on the dock; appellant told Ferroni that they had no right to be there because he had 'the contract' to haul horses to and from the track. Ferroni replied that he had letters and telegrams authorizing him to pick up some horses and transport them to the track. Ayer and Ferroni remained at the dock, but their horses did not arrive.

On the morning of the next day, October 13th, Ayer and Armstrong went to the station in separate vans; Ferroni arrived shortly thereafter. There were a number of people on the dock waiting for the train. Ayer waited near Armstrong's van. Plaintiff stated that a man whom he did not know, and who proved to be Ray Robinson, appellant's son, came up to him and asked him if he was the driver of Ferroni's van. When plaintiff said 'yes', Robinson said 'You'll have to move it.' Ayer replied that he would not move the van until he picked up his horses, whereupon Robinson said: 'If you don't move it, I will.' As robinson started to walk down the dock toward the van, plaintiff told Ferroni what Robinson had said, and Ferroni began to walk rapidly after Robinson. Ferroni called out 'Hey Heavy', whereupon Robinson wheeled about and struck him on the head, knocking him to the ground. Robinson then jumped on top of Ferroni and began pounding him about the face and body. Plaintiff testified that while Robinson was hitting Ferroni, appellant was 'egging him on' and shouted 'Hit him; kill the s. b.' and 'Here is the other s. b.; get him too.' Plaintiff ran up to the scene. Meanwhile, a man named Witt seized Robinson's arms and tried to pin them to his body. Robinson swung at Witt. Witt testified that appellant then shouted 'No, it is not him. It is that one over there' and pointed to plaintiff. Robinson then hit plaintiff in the face, knocked him down, beat him about the face and body, picked him up and shoved him against the railing of the dock, and raised his fist to strike Ayer again, whereupon a Mr. French, and employee of the railroad, told him to stop or he would hit him with a crowbar. Armstrong testified that when French intervened, appellant called out: 'Let 'em go it.' Plaintiff suffered severe personal injuries, including three broken ribs, as a result of the beating.

Appellant's version of the circumstances occurring on October 11th, 12th and 13th differed materially from the versions related by plaintiff and his witnesses. Appellant testified that on October 11th plaintiff parked Ferroni's van beside one of his own vans, making it impossible for him to load horses through the side gate. The van had room for eight horses, but only two could be loaded through the rear gate of the vehicle. Appellant asked plaintiff to move his van, but Ayer refused and became belligerent. The following day, plaintiff again parked his van in such a way as to prevent appellant from loading horses through the side gate. When appellant asked Ayer and Ferroni to move their vehicle they swore at him and threatened to 'get' him either at the station or at the race-track. However, within 15 or 20 minutes they did move their truck about 20 feet and Robinson loaded his horses. That night, appellant visited his son, who was a fireman employed by the City of Los Angeles. Appellant told him that two men had been blocking his van, and that they were going to 'get' him; he did not identify Ayer and Ferroni by name. Appellant denied calling out to his son during the altercation; several other witnesses to the fight testified that they did not hear appellant say anything to his son.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Susag v. City of Lake Forest
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 8, 2002
    ...the deputies can be liable for using excessive force even if they had no physical contact with him. He cites Ayer v. Robinson (1958) 163 Cal.App.2d 424, 428, 329 P.2d 546, for the proposition that a "party injured by an unjustified assault may recover damages not only from the actual assail......
  • Knapps v. City of Oakland
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • August 3, 2009
    ...only from the actual assailant, but from any other person who aids, abets, counsels or encourages the assault." Ayer v. Robinson, 163 Cal.App.2d 424, 428, 329 P.2d 546 (1958); Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Agency, 261 F.3d 912, 926 (9th Cir.2001). However, in the context of an excessi......
  • James v. Wilson, 1999-CA-000787-MR.
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • April 19, 2002
    ...Kan. 563, 27 Pac.States Rep. 424; 4 Am.Jur. 127, Assault and Battery, sec. 4; 52 Am.Jur. 455, Torts, sec. 116. (5) Ayer v. Robinson, 163 Cal.App.2d 424, 329 P.2d 546 (1958), A party injured by an unjustified assault may recover damages not only from the actual assailant, but from any other ......
  • Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 13, 2000
    ...contact Arpin alleged in her complaint is Officers Stone and Barnes' use of excessive force when arresting her. In Ayer v. Robinson, 329 P.2d 546, 549 (Cal. App. 1958), the California Court of Appeal held that a "party injured by an unjustified assault may recover damages not only from the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT