Ayers v. City of Miami, s. 90-1363

Decision Date12 March 1991
Docket NumberNos. 90-1363,90-1206,s. 90-1363
Citation578 So.2d 302,16 Fla. L. Weekly 666
Parties16 Fla. L. Weekly 666 Ellis AYERS, Jr. and Carol Ayers, Appellants, v. The CITY OF MIAMI and Peoples Gas System, Inc., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Chonin & Sher and Marilyn Sher, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Adams, Hunter, Angones, Adams, Adams & McClure and Christopher Lynch, Jorge L. Fernandez and Kathryn S. Pecko and Charles C. Mays, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and GERSTEN, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals the plaintiffs/appellants, Ellis Ayers, Jr. and his wife Carol, appeal from the entry of two adverse Summary Final Judgments in a negligence action.

On the evening of January 7, 1988, the plaintiff/appellant, Ellis Ayers, Jr., while en route to a laundromat, crossed N.W. 16th Street, from the north side of the street, where his apartment is located, to the south side of the street. Mr. Ayers did not cross at the intersection. As Ayers was crossing the street in what was described as a "catty corner" manner, a car rounded the corner and proceeded down the street towards him. In an effort to avoid being hit by the oncoming car, in his flight to the sidewalk on the south side of the street, Ayers stepped into an uncapped gas valve box, which was six to eight inches in circumference, thereby injuring himself. It was alleged by the plaintiff that the gas valve box cover had been missing for at least two weeks. The portion of N.W. 16th street where the incident occurred is located in and maintained by the City of Miami. Peoples Gas owned the gas valve box.

The Ayers filed a negligence action against the City of Miami and Peoples Gas, which alleged that the defendants negligently failed to correct an unsafe condition, of which they knew or should have known about. The defendants answered and moved for Final Summary Judgment. The trial court granted both motions. These appeals follows.

The trial court erred in granting Final Summary Judgment for the defendants. The fact that the discrete and sizable hole in which the plaintiff was injured was in a portion of the street that was outside the cross-walk or intersection, did not, as a matter of law, relieve the defendants of their duty to pedestrians to exercise reasonable care in the repair of that portion of the street.

The evidence was subject to the construction that the condition had existed for a period in excess of two to three weeks. Under the circumstances, the fact of constructive notice became an issue to be presented to a jury. See City of St. Petersburg v. Roach, 148 Fla. 316, 4 So.2d 367 (1941); Camina v. Parliament Insurance Co., 417 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Packer v. Winston Tower 100 Assoc., Inc., 377 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); City of Miami v. Lawson, 104 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).

The fact that the plaintiff knew of the condition goes to his comparative negligence, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Leonard v. Wakulla County, 96-1450
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Febrero 1997
    ...bar recovery...." Hancock v. Department of Corrections, 585 So.2d 1068, 1071 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); see also Ayers v. City of Miami, 578 So.2d 302, 304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). Here, there is no evidence as to whether the danger was readily apparent to the public. As a result, since it cannot be s......
  • Grier v. Metropolitan Dade County
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 8 Marzo 1995
    ...than the remainder of the street given over to the passage of vehicles. 148 Fla. at 610, 4 So.2d at 876; see also Ayers v. City of Miami, 578 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla. 3d DCA) (fact that plaintiff was injured in portion of street outside the crosswalk or intersection did not relieve city of its ......
  • San Miguel v. City of Miami, 3D99-1120.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 31 Mayo 2000
    ...(wet floor); Skipper v. Barnes Supermarket, 573 So.2d 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (spilled spaghetti strewn over floor); Ayers v. City of Miami, 578 So.2d 302 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (uncapped gas valve box); Spaulding v. City of Melbourne, 473 So.2d 226 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (broken sidewalk); Pentec......
  • Howard v. Jackson County, s. 92-112
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 Mayo 1993
    ...time that a dangerous condition exists is relevant to whether a defendant had constructive notice of the condition. Ayers v. City of Miami, 578 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. den., 591 So.2d 180 (Fla.1991). A key defense at trial was that the County is not negligent because the County C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT