Backer v. Gonder Ceramic Arts
Decision Date | 29 May 1950 |
Citation | 90 F. Supp. 737 |
Parties | BACKER v. GONDER CERAMIC ARTS, Inc., et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Munn, Liddy & Glaccum, New York City, for plaintiff.
Margaret W. Smith, Howson & Howson, New York City, for defendant Gonder Ceramic Arts, Inc.
Defendant, Gonder Ceramic Arts, Inc., has moved to quash the service of process upon it and to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction over the defendant, an Ohio corporation, or its agents.
The action is for copyright infringement and venue is governed by Section 1400(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A. which provides that: "Civil actions, suits, or proceedings arising under any Act of Congress relating to copyrights may be instituted in the district in which the defendant or his agent resides or may be found."
The questions of venue and service are essentially the same question, for the corporate defendant could only be "found" in this district if it has an agent here and is doing continuous business in the district, in which event the same person representing the corporation would be a sufficient agent for valid service of process. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Royal Plastics Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1948, 81 F. Supp. 555.
Defendant contends at the outset that Section 1400(a) requires a stronger finding of "presence" of a corporation in a district than is usually required in order to obtain jurisdiction over a corporate defendant. There is no merit to this contention. The Supreme Court has said that "found" is equivalent to "presence" within a district, People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 1918, 246 U.S. 79, 84, 38 S.Ct. 233, 62 L.Ed. 587, Ann.Cas. 1918C, 537, and "presence" is now considered the test of whether a foreign corporation is subject to process in the general case. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 1945, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95, 161 A.L.R. 1057. The Supreme Court in that case stated that a corporation was present in a state and subject to its process when: 326 U.S. at page 320, 66 S.Ct. at page 160.
Service upon the defendant corporation was effected in this state by serving the defendant David Fisk as "agent" of Gonder Ceramic Arts, Inc., an Ohio corporation which manufactures and sells various ceramic articles.
David Fisk has an office at 225 Fifth Avenue, New York City, and calls himself a "manufacturer's representative." He solicits orders for the corporate defendant in New York, and alleges that he also solicits orders for two other out-of-state corporations. Fisk claims to be merely an independent contractor. The affidavits submitted upon this motion indicate otherwise. The name of Gonder Ceramic Arts, Inc. appears prominently upon the entrance to Fisk's office, with neither of the names of the other two corporations for which he allegedly solicits orders so appearing. The corporate defendant is also listed in the telephone directory with the same telephone number and address as Fisk's, and is also listed in the directory in Fisk's office building. Neither of the other aforementioned corporations is so listed. Furthermore, it appears that defendant Gonder Ceramic Arts' letterheads list Fisk's office ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
PPS, Inc. v. Jewelry Sales Representatives, Inc.
...N.Y.S.2d 47 (Sup.Ct.1973). 13 Compare Dolly Toy Co. v. Bancroft-Rellim Corp., 97 F.Supp. 531 (S.D.N.Y.1951); Backer v. Gonder Ceramic Arts, Inc., 90 F. Supp. 737 (S.D.N.Y.1950), Hodom v. Stearns, 32 A.D.2d 234, 301 N.Y.S.2d 146 (4th Dep't), appeal dismissed, 25 N.Y.2d 722, 307 N.Y.S.2d 225,......
-
Geo-Physical Maps v. Toycraft Corporation
...far as defendant Toycraft is concerned, the question of personal jurisdiction and of venue are one and the same. Backer v. Gonder Ceramic Arts, D.C.S. D.N.Y., 90 F.Supp. 737. In order for a non-resident corporate defendant to be amenable to suit in this district under the standards enunciat......
-
Securities Training Corp. v. SECURITIES SEMINAR
...jurisdiction over foreign corporations is governed by New York's long-arm statute, N.Y. CPLR § 302(a).6 See Backer v. Gonder Ceramic Arts, Inc., 90 F.Supp. 737 (S.D.N.Y.1950). Plaintiff has the burden of proving that this Court has jurisdiction over defendants. Birmingham Fire Ins. Co. v. K......
-
Dolly Toy Co. v. Bancroft-Rellim Corp.
... ... Backer v. Gonder Ceramic Arts, Inc., decided by this Court in May 1950, 90 ... ...